Authoritarianism as practice: On the turn toward policing in social media data monitoring

This commentary argues that critically examining the industry of AI-powered analytics using OSINT (Open Source Intelligence) data from multiple digital platforms for state surveillance agendas is a crucial avenue toward understanding authoritarianism in the US context. This is evidenced most recently in the targeting of international students posting pro-Palestine content, but the uptake of platform data for state surveillance is part of an initiative towards privatized social listening software that predates the Trump administration. The agendas of privatized national security have shaped the norms that guide platform monitoring over the past few years at the same time as there are fewer data monitoring tools for NGO and non-state applications. I suggest that this trend requires us to understand authoritarianism as a set of practices staked on the erosion of accountability for digital platforms and the establishment of latent surveillance capacities that can be activated at any point by political power.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues on Digital Society
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768640251379101
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Authoritarianism as practice: On the turn toward policing in social media data monitoring

Dialogues on Digital Society
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Authoritarianism as practice: On the turn toward policing in social media data monitoring

article en

Abstract

This commentary argues that critically examining the industry of AI-powered analytics using OSINT (Open Source Intelligence) data from multiple digital platforms for state surveillance agendas is a crucial avenue toward understanding authoritarianism in the US context. This is evidenced most recently in the targeting of international students posting pro-Palestine content, but the uptake of platform data for state surveillance is part of an initiative towards privatized social listening software that predates the Trump administration. The agendas of privatized national security have shaped the norms that guide platform monitoring over the past few years at the same time as there are fewer data monitoring tools for NGO and non-state applications. I suggest that this trend requires us to understand authoritarianism as a set of practices staked on the erosion of accountability for digital platforms and the establishment of latent surveillance capacities that can be activated at any point by political power.

Dialogues on Digital SocietyVol. 1(3)
University of Minnesota System (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.