Confidence Estimation of the Ratio of Variances of Two Log-normal Populations

This study investigates asymptotic and bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of variances of two independent log-normal distributions. Extensive simulations were conducted to evaluate the performance of these CIs under varying sample sizes (10 to 350) and variance ratios, with one variance fixed at 0.1 and the other varying from 0.1 to 2.0. The impacts of balanced and unbalanced designs on sample size were studied. The results reveal that the asymptotic CI performs well for small variance differences, especially with moderate to large sample sizes, while bootstrap CIs outperform it for larger variance differences. Notably, the $$t$$ -bootstrap CI excels when both the variance difference and sample sizes are large, whereas the percentile and standard bootstrap CIs are preferable for small variance differences. The study also demonstrates the practical application of these methods using PM2.5 mass concentration data from two industrial sites in Thailand, confirming their effectiveness in real-world scenarios.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1995080225606794
Primary Topic
Hume's philosophy and hair distribution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Confidence Estimation of the Ratio of Variances of Two Log-normal Populations

Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics
Hume's philosophy and hair distribution
article

Confidence Estimation of the Ratio of Variances of Two Log-normal Populations

article en

Abstract

This study investigates asymptotic and bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of variances of two independent log-normal distributions. Extensive simulations were conducted to evaluate the performance of these CIs under varying sample sizes (10 to 350) and variance ratios, with one variance fixed at 0.1 and the other varying from 0.1 to 2.0. The impacts of balanced and unbalanced designs on sample size were studied. The results reveal that the asymptotic CI performs well for small variance differences, especially with moderate to large sample sizes, while bootstrap CIs outperform it for larger variance differences. Notably, the $$t$$ -bootstrap CI excels when both the variance difference and sample sizes are large, whereas the percentile and standard bootstrap CIs are preferable for small variance differences. The study also demonstrates the practical application of these methods using PM2.5 mass concentration data from two industrial sites in Thailand, confirming their effectiveness in real-world scenarios.

Lobachevskii Journal of MathematicsVol. 46(5)
Burapha University (TH), University of Regina (CA), Nakhon Sawan Rajabhat University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Hume's philosophy and hair distribution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.