The collective rights dimension of the Platform Work Directive: Assessing regulatory effectiveness in the digital labour context

This article examines the collective labour rights dimension of the EU Platform Work Directive (PWD), drawing on a normative framework centred on personal scope, material scope, and enforcement. The analysis shows that while the Directive represents a milestone in regulating employment status and algorithmic management, its ability to rebalance bargaining power remains uncertain. The PWD makes progress by extending key rights related to automated monitoring and decision-making systems to all ‘persons performing platform work,’ including the self-employed. However, consultation rights remain limited to employees, leaving self-employed workers with more limited prerogatives. The Directive also falls short in addressing subcontracting practices that separate platforms’ economic power from legal accountability, thereby weakening meaningful collective engagement. In addition, although pioneering rights concerning algorithmic management and data use are introduced, their implications for core working conditions such as wages and working time are largely overlooked. By contrast, the enforcement dimension emerges as comparatively stronger, granting workers’ representatives a more active role. The article concludes by outlining policy options - including stricter rules on subcontracting, a directive on algorithmic management at work, and greater attention to labour market power - to reinforce collective labour rights in a digitalised economy.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Labour Law Journal
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525251375024
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The collective rights dimension of the Platform Work Directive: Assessing regulatory effectiveness in the digital labour context

European Labour Law Journal
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

The collective rights dimension of the Platform Work Directive: Assessing regulatory effectiveness in the digital labour context

article en

Abstract

This article examines the collective labour rights dimension of the EU Platform Work Directive (PWD), drawing on a normative framework centred on personal scope, material scope, and enforcement. The analysis shows that while the Directive represents a milestone in regulating employment status and algorithmic management, its ability to rebalance bargaining power remains uncertain. The PWD makes progress by extending key rights related to automated monitoring and decision-making systems to all ‘persons performing platform work,’ including the self-employed. However, consultation rights remain limited to employees, leaving self-employed workers with more limited prerogatives. The Directive also falls short in addressing subcontracting practices that separate platforms’ economic power from legal accountability, thereby weakening meaningful collective engagement. In addition, although pioneering rights concerning algorithmic management and data use are introduced, their implications for core working conditions such as wages and working time are largely overlooked. By contrast, the enforcement dimension emerges as comparatively stronger, granting workers’ representatives a more active role. The article concludes by outlining policy options - including stricter rules on subcontracting, a directive on algorithmic management at work, and greater attention to labour market power - to reinforce collective labour rights in a digitalised economy.

European Labour Law JournalVol. 16(4)
European Trade Union Institute (BE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.