Exploring the Legacy Practice of Flushing in Controlled-environment Production of High-CBD Cannabis (Cannabis sativa)

In controlled-environment cannabis ( Cannabis sativa L.) production, restricting fertilizer application and maintaining low substrate electrical conductivity (EC) before harvest, which is termed “flushing,” is a standard procedure that is hypothesized to reduce inflorescence mineral nutrient concentrations, thereby improving dried inflorescence smoking quality, without impacting inflorescence yield. The objective of this study was to determine if flushing impacts yield, concentration of cannabinoids, or mineral nutrient concentrations of inflorescences. Two high-cannabidiol (CBD) cannabis cultivars, THM Jack and Southern OG, were flowered under a 12-hour photoperiod harvested at 7 weeks or 8 weeks, respectively. ‘THM Jack’ was subjected to preharvest flush durations from 0 to 3 weeks, and ‘Southern OG’ was subjected to preharvest flush durations from 0 to 4 weeks. Inflorescence dry mass (kg·m −2 ) declined as flush duration increased, but trim dry mass was unaffected. Additionally, Cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentrations were not impacted in ‘THM Jack’, but CBD concentration increased with flush duration in ‘Southern OG’. The increase in CBD concentration did not compensate for the decline in inflorescence mass, which resulted in a decline in CBD yield (g·m −2 ). Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium concentrations declined in both cultivars as flush duration increased. Collectively, these results indicate that flushing can impact dry mass and tissue concentrations of cannabinoids and mineral nutrients. Whether these changes are beneficial depends on weighing a desired outcome (e.g., reduce fertilizer costs, improve smoking quality, manipulate cannabinoid concentration) against a loss in inflorescence and/or cannabinoid yield. Future research should evaluate how restriction of specific nutrients might impact inflorescence growth or organoleptic properties as well as potential differences in cultivar sensitivity to flushing based on seasonal variation in controlled environments.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HortScience
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci18752-25
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Legacy Practice of Flushing in Controlled-environment Production of High-CBD Cannabis (Cannabis sativa)

HortScience
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Exploring the Legacy Practice of Flushing in Controlled-environment Production of High-CBD Cannabis (Cannabis sativa)

article en

Abstract

In controlled-environment cannabis ( Cannabis sativa L.) production, restricting fertilizer application and maintaining low substrate electrical conductivity (EC) before harvest, which is termed “flushing,” is a standard procedure that is hypothesized to reduce inflorescence mineral nutrient concentrations, thereby improving dried inflorescence smoking quality, without impacting inflorescence yield. The objective of this study was to determine if flushing impacts yield, concentration of cannabinoids, or mineral nutrient concentrations of inflorescences. Two high-cannabidiol (CBD) cannabis cultivars, THM Jack and Southern OG, were flowered under a 12-hour photoperiod harvested at 7 weeks or 8 weeks, respectively. ‘THM Jack’ was subjected to preharvest flush durations from 0 to 3 weeks, and ‘Southern OG’ was subjected to preharvest flush durations from 0 to 4 weeks. Inflorescence dry mass (kg·m −2 ) declined as flush duration increased, but trim dry mass was unaffected. Additionally, Cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentrations were not impacted in ‘THM Jack’, but CBD concentration increased with flush duration in ‘Southern OG’. The increase in CBD concentration did not compensate for the decline in inflorescence mass, which resulted in a decline in CBD yield (g·m −2 ). Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium concentrations declined in both cultivars as flush duration increased. Collectively, these results indicate that flushing can impact dry mass and tissue concentrations of cannabinoids and mineral nutrients. Whether these changes are beneficial depends on weighing a desired outcome (e.g., reduce fertilizer costs, improve smoking quality, manipulate cannabinoid concentration) against a loss in inflorescence and/or cannabinoid yield. Future research should evaluate how restriction of specific nutrients might impact inflorescence growth or organoleptic properties as well as potential differences in cultivar sensitivity to flushing based on seasonal variation in controlled environments.

HortScienceVol. 60(10)
Clemson University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.