States Take the Lead in Evaluating and Improving Tax Incentives

Each year, states collectively spend tens of billions of dollars on tax incentive programs. Despite being states’ largest investment in economic development, research from The Pew Charitable Trusts found in 2012 that no state regularly and rigorously evaluated the effectiveness of incentives. This left policy makers with very little information to guide decision making. Since 2012, there has been a sea change: More than two-thirds of states and several major cities now regularly produce high quality evaluations of their major incentives, using rigorous and creative methods to measure impact. Pew's research both informed and followed this shift in the field. In addition to assessing the effects of incentives, these evaluations also provide a wealth of valuable information on how to design more effective incentives. As a result, policy makers are better informed and capitalize on the new information as they launch, continue, modify, or repeal programs.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Development Quarterly
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424251378378
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

States Take the Lead in Evaluating and Improving Tax Incentives

Economic Development Quarterly
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

States Take the Lead in Evaluating and Improving Tax Incentives

article en

Abstract

Each year, states collectively spend tens of billions of dollars on tax incentive programs. Despite being states’ largest investment in economic development, research from The Pew Charitable Trusts found in 2012 that no state regularly and rigorously evaluated the effectiveness of incentives. This left policy makers with very little information to guide decision making. Since 2012, there has been a sea change: More than two-thirds of states and several major cities now regularly produce high quality evaluations of their major incentives, using rigorous and creative methods to measure impact. Pew's research both informed and followed this shift in the field. In addition to assessing the effects of incentives, these evaluations also provide a wealth of valuable information on how to design more effective incentives. As a result, policy makers are better informed and capitalize on the new information as they launch, continue, modify, or repeal programs.

Economic Development QuarterlyVol. 39(4)
Pew Charitable Trusts (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.