Quantifying uncertainty in machine learning for nuclear binding energy

Machine learning (ML) is rapidly becoming an important technique in nuclear physics. However, applying machine learning reliably requires quantifying the uncertainty in an ML model, which can be computationally very expensive, requiring multiple runs of training. Researchers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have, for the first time in nuclear physics, implemented a method to combine training data features with biases also selected from the training data features, which allow for simultaneous fitting and uncertainty quantification. When applied to nuclear binding energies, the new method not only successfully quantifies the errors, but in particular signals when the ML model is extrapolated too far from data and becomes unreliable. This heralds a new ability to extrapolate data to extreme conditions, with reduced computational resources, yet without compromising our knowledge of how trustworthy the extrapolation is.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. C
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/tdk4-c4tp
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying uncertainty in machine learning for nuclear binding energy

1 citations
Physical review. C
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
article

Quantifying uncertainty in machine learning for nuclear binding energy

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) is rapidly becoming an important technique in nuclear physics. However, applying machine learning reliably requires quantifying the uncertainty in an ML model, which can be computationally very expensive, requiring multiple runs of training. Researchers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have, for the first time in nuclear physics, implemented a method to combine training data features with biases also selected from the training data features, which allow for simultaneous fitting and uncertainty quantification. When applied to nuclear binding energies, the new method not only successfully quantifies the errors, but in particular signals when the ML model is extrapolated too far from data and becomes unreliable. This heralds a new ability to extrapolate data to extreme conditions, with reduced computational resources, yet without compromising our knowledge of how trustworthy the extrapolation is.

Physical review. CVol. 112(3)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.