Meta‐Analysis of Function‐Based Behavioral Treatment Outcomes in Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation

ABSTRACT Challenging behavior following acquired brain injury can limit access to care and endanger both patients and providers. This meta‐analysis extends prior work by examining the relative efficaciousness of treatments based upon outcomes of indirect, descriptive, and functional analysis. Forty‐seven single‐case design studies were included and categorized by their use of functional behavior assessment procedures (i.e., indirect assessment, descriptive assessment, and functional analysis) and function‐based treatments. Treatment effects were evaluated using both visual analysis and standard mean difference (SMD); outcomes of both analyses showed that treatments based on functional analysis outcomes produced the highest proportion of clinically significant improvements. Treatments that were not function‐based were less effective. These findings provide further support for behavioral interventions in brain injury rehabilitation and illustrate that treatment effectiveness is enhanced when interventions are informed by more robust FBA methods particularly functional analysis.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Interventions
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.70034
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meta‐Analysis of Function‐Based Behavioral Treatment Outcomes in Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation

Behavioral Interventions
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Meta‐Analysis of Function‐Based Behavioral Treatment Outcomes in Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Challenging behavior following acquired brain injury can limit access to care and endanger both patients and providers. This meta‐analysis extends prior work by examining the relative efficaciousness of treatments based upon outcomes of indirect, descriptive, and functional analysis. Forty‐seven single‐case design studies were included and categorized by their use of functional behavior assessment procedures (i.e., indirect assessment, descriptive assessment, and functional analysis) and function‐based treatments. Treatment effects were evaluated using both visual analysis and standard mean difference (SMD); outcomes of both analyses showed that treatments based on functional analysis outcomes produced the highest proportion of clinically significant improvements. Treatments that were not function‐based were less effective. These findings provide further support for behavioral interventions in brain injury rehabilitation and illustrate that treatment effectiveness is enhanced when interventions are informed by more robust FBA methods particularly functional analysis.

Behavioral InterventionsVol. 40(4)
Craig Hospital (US), Western New England University (US), New England Center for Children (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Meta‐Analysis of Function‐Based Behavioral Treatment Outcomes in Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation · Behavioral Interventions (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS