CLIMATE DIPLOMACY AFTER THE PARIS AGREEMENT: THE QUEST FOR GLOBAL GOVERNANCE AND JUSTICE

Abstract: The Paris Agreement, adopted in 2015 under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), has been recognized as a landmark in global climate governance. Unlike previous arrangements such as the Kyoto Protocol, the Paris framework is characterized by a bottom-up approach through Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), enhanced transparency mechanisms, and a long-term goal of limiting global warming to well below 2 °C, preferably 1.5 °C. This study aims to examine the evolution of climate diplomacy in the post-Paris era, focusing on the roles of state and non-state actors, the challenges of multilateral negotiations, and the implications for global governance. Relying on a literature-based conceptual analysis, the article identifies three key dynamics: the transformation of negotiation practices, the growing involvement of civil society and private sector actors, and the persistent North-South divide concerning equity and climate justice. The findings reveal that while the Paris Agreement has expanded the scope of inclusiveness in climate diplomacy, it also introduced complexities regarding compliance, financing, and the geopolitics of energy security. The article concludes that post-Paris climate diplomacy is increasingly embedded in broader security, economic, and justice discourses, requiring innovative governance models to achieve the net-zero targets of 2050. In addition, the Paris Agreement has been interpreted as an experiment in “polycentric governance,” where authority is distributed across multiple levels of decision-making from local governments to international organizations (Jordan et al., 2018). This polycentric nature allows for innovation, experimentation, and diffusion of best practices, yet it also raises challenges of coherence and accountability. Furthermore, the emphasis on climate finance and capacity-building for developing countries has elevated the discourse on equity to an unprecedented level in climate negotiations. By embedding climate diplomacy within global security and economic agendas, the Paris era signals a fundamental redefinition of multilateralism in the 21st century.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17129320
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CLIMATE DIPLOMACY AFTER THE PARIS AGREEMENT: THE QUEST FOR GLOBAL GOVERNANCE AND JUSTICE

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

CLIMATE DIPLOMACY AFTER THE PARIS AGREEMENT: THE QUEST FOR GLOBAL GOVERNANCE AND JUSTICE

article en

Abstract

Abstract: The Paris Agreement, adopted in 2015 under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), has been recognized as a landmark in global climate governance. Unlike previous arrangements such as the Kyoto Protocol, the Paris framework is characterized by a bottom-up approach through Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), enhanced transparency mechanisms, and a long-term goal of limiting global warming to well below 2 °C, preferably 1.5 °C. This study aims to examine the evolution of climate diplomacy in the post-Paris era, focusing on the roles of state and non-state actors, the challenges of multilateral negotiations, and the implications for global governance. Relying on a literature-based conceptual analysis, the article identifies three key dynamics: the transformation of negotiation practices, the growing involvement of civil society and private sector actors, and the persistent North-South divide concerning equity and climate justice. The findings reveal that while the Paris Agreement has expanded the scope of inclusiveness in climate diplomacy, it also introduced complexities regarding compliance, financing, and the geopolitics of energy security. The article concludes that post-Paris climate diplomacy is increasingly embedded in broader security, economic, and justice discourses, requiring innovative governance models to achieve the net-zero targets of 2050. In addition, the Paris Agreement has been interpreted as an experiment in “polycentric governance,” where authority is distributed across multiple levels of decision-making from local governments to international organizations (Jordan et al., 2018). This polycentric nature allows for innovation, experimentation, and diffusion of best practices, yet it also raises challenges of coherence and accountability. Furthermore, the emphasis on climate finance and capacity-building for developing countries has elevated the discourse on equity to an unprecedented level in climate negotiations. By embedding climate diplomacy within global security and economic agendas, the Paris era signals a fundamental redefinition of multilateralism in the 21st century.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
St Clements University Higher Education School (NU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CLIMATE DIPLOMACY AFTER THE PARIS AGREEMENT: THE QUEST FOR GLOBAL GOVERNANCE AND JUSTICE · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS