Genetic and plastic effects on trait variability in two major tree species: Insights from common garden experiments across Europe

Phenotypic plasticity and genetic adaptation are key mechanisms that enable species to respond to changing environments. Tree traits do not vary independently but rather in coordination. However, our understanding of whether functional traits are governed by the same mechanism is still uncomplete. Thus, we aim at assessing the drivers of trait variability of sessile oak and European beech provenances across their distribution ranges. We estimated growth-related and leaf morphological traits from 9 and 11 provenances of oak ( Quercus petraea ) and beech ( Fagus sylvatica ), respectively, grown in four different common gardens distributed across their respective distribution areas. Overall, phenotypic plasticity played a dominant role in explaining individual trait variability. For most oak traits, variation among provenances and genetically based plasticity were correlated with the climate of origin, whereas for beech both provenance-related variation and plasticity showed fewer significant associations with the climate of origin. In oak, climate-transfer distance analyses revealed that some trait measures decreased when provenances were moved away from their local precipitation regime. In beech, significant climate-transfer distances were fewer and primarily related to temperature-related parameters. The pattern of multi-trait phenotypes indicates that resource-use strategies among provenances covary with the temperatures of origin in both species. Although beech shows adaptive potential through genetic differentiation among populations, most trait variation is plastic, which may not suffice long term to cope with extreme climatic events. Oak, by contrast, appears more responsive through adaptive mechanisms. Our study enhances understanding of the interplay between genetic adaptation and phenotypic plasticity in long-lived forest trees. • Phenotypic plasticity mainly drives trait variation in oak and beech trees. • Oak shows climate-linked genetic plasticity, beech relies mostly on plasticity. • Oak may adapt better to climate change, plasticity could hinder beech.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Ecology and Management
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123126
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetic and plastic effects on trait variability in two major tree species: Insights from common garden experiments across Europe

2 citations
Forest Ecology and Management
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
4.96
article

Genetic and plastic effects on trait variability in two major tree species: Insights from common garden experiments across Europe

article en
2 citations

Abstract

Phenotypic plasticity and genetic adaptation are key mechanisms that enable species to respond to changing environments. Tree traits do not vary independently but rather in coordination. However, our understanding of whether functional traits are governed by the same mechanism is still uncomplete. Thus, we aim at assessing the drivers of trait variability of sessile oak and European beech provenances across their distribution ranges. We estimated growth-related and leaf morphological traits from 9 and 11 provenances of oak ( Quercus petraea ) and beech ( Fagus sylvatica ), respectively, grown in four different common gardens distributed across their respective distribution areas. Overall, phenotypic plasticity played a dominant role in explaining individual trait variability. For most oak traits, variation among provenances and genetically based plasticity were correlated with the climate of origin, whereas for beech both provenance-related variation and plasticity showed fewer significant associations with the climate of origin. In oak, climate-transfer distance analyses revealed that some trait measures decreased when provenances were moved away from their local precipitation regime. In beech, significant climate-transfer distances were fewer and primarily related to temperature-related parameters. The pattern of multi-trait phenotypes indicates that resource-use strategies among provenances covary with the temperatures of origin in both species. Although beech shows adaptive potential through genetic differentiation among populations, most trait variation is plastic, which may not suffice long term to cope with extreme climatic events. Oak, by contrast, appears more responsive through adaptive mechanisms. Our study enhances understanding of the interplay between genetic adaptation and phenotypic plasticity in long-lived forest trees. • Phenotypic plasticity mainly drives trait variation in oak and beech trees. • Oak shows climate-linked genetic plasticity, beech relies mostly on plasticity. • Oak may adapt better to climate change, plasticity could hinder beech.

Forest Ecology and ManagementVol. 597
Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research (CH), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Copenhagen Business School (DK), Forestry Research Institute of Sweden (SE), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), ETH Zurich (CH), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institute of Dendrology (PL), Forest Research (GB), Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (ES), Forest Research Institute (BG), UMR BIOdiversity, GEnes & Communities (FR), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
European Commission, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.