Survival Outcomes of Teeth Retained by Endodontic Therapy Versus Prosthodontic Rehabilitation Following Segmental Mandibulectomy in Oral Cancer Patients

Background: Oral cancer often requires segmental mandibulectomy, which involves removing part of the mandible. Following surgery, rehabilitation options, such as endodontic therapy or prosthodontic rehabilitation, play crucial roles in restoring functionality, aesthetics, and the patient's quality of life. This study compares the survival of retained teeth with endodontic therapy versus those rehabilitated with prosthodontic methods in oral cancer patients after segmental mandibulectomy. Methods: A prospective clinical trial with 60 oral cancer patients undergoing segmental mandibulectomy was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A received endodontic therapy to preserve natural teeth, and Group B underwent prosthodontic rehabilitation (e.g., dental implants, crowns, or dentures). The survival rates and functional outcomes were measured over 24 months. Results: In Group A, 83.3% of retained teeth survived with minimal complications, while in Group B, 90% of prosthodontic rehabilitations were successful. Group A reported lower complications, while Group B showed a higher chewing efficiency and a slightly higher incidence of complications, including one case of cancer recurrence. Conclusions: Both endodontic therapy and prosthodontic rehabilitation are effective for oral cancer patients post-mandibulectomy, with prosthodontic rehabilitation offering superior chewing efficiency. Future studies with extended follow-up could provide further insights into optimizing treatment strategies.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Carcinogenesis
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64149/j.carcinog.24.4s.889-895
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survival Outcomes of Teeth Retained by Endodontic Therapy Versus Prosthodontic Rehabilitation Following Segmental Mandibulectomy in Oral Cancer Patients

Journal of Carcinogenesis
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Survival Outcomes of Teeth Retained by Endodontic Therapy Versus Prosthodontic Rehabilitation Following Segmental Mandibulectomy in Oral Cancer Patients

article en

Abstract

Background: Oral cancer often requires segmental mandibulectomy, which involves removing part of the mandible. Following surgery, rehabilitation options, such as endodontic therapy or prosthodontic rehabilitation, play crucial roles in restoring functionality, aesthetics, and the patient's quality of life. This study compares the survival of retained teeth with endodontic therapy versus those rehabilitated with prosthodontic methods in oral cancer patients after segmental mandibulectomy. Methods: A prospective clinical trial with 60 oral cancer patients undergoing segmental mandibulectomy was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A received endodontic therapy to preserve natural teeth, and Group B underwent prosthodontic rehabilitation (e.g., dental implants, crowns, or dentures). The survival rates and functional outcomes were measured over 24 months. Results: In Group A, 83.3% of retained teeth survived with minimal complications, while in Group B, 90% of prosthodontic rehabilitations were successful. Group A reported lower complications, while Group B showed a higher chewing efficiency and a slightly higher incidence of complications, including one case of cancer recurrence. Conclusions: Both endodontic therapy and prosthodontic rehabilitation are effective for oral cancer patients post-mandibulectomy, with prosthodontic rehabilitation offering superior chewing efficiency. Future studies with extended follow-up could provide further insights into optimizing treatment strategies.

Journal of CarcinogenesisVol. 24(4s)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.