Geometrical Selection in an Array of Ice Crystals: A Comparison with Two-Dimensional Models

The tilt angle θ and the azimuthal angle α of the crystallographic c axes of ice crystals grown in a thin water layer were determined by using a cross-polarized transmission microscope and the birefringent properties of ice crystals. Ice microcrystals originated from ice grains obtained by mass crystallization of supercooled water inside a channel between two glass slides. The experimentally found two-angle distribution N(α, θ) of crystal orientations that remained after the process of cooperative growth exhibits some peculiarities that are not predicted by known two-dimensional (2D) models of geometrical selection: (1) Instead of a single peak at zero angles α and θ, N(α, θ) has coupled peaks shifted toward larger angles. We successfully explained this behavior by the effect of the thickening of ice crystals in the c direction during their cooperative growth. In contrast, the previous 2D models consider crystals as ideally thin needles which do not grow in the transverse direction. (2) The selectivity of the c axis orientations depends more on the increase of the α angle than on θ. N(α, θ) shows high values over a wide range of θ from 0° up to 70°, which is not taken into account by the 2D models considering needle-shaped or one-dimensional crystals. In this case, turning the crystal by an angle θ means rotating the needle around its longitudinal axis. This does not actually change the crystal orientation in the 2D space. We also found that the ice–water interfaces at 0 °C of the grown crystals mainly consisted of the bipyramidal surfaces, although individual ice crystals exhibited different values of α and θ. The appearance of crystals with the prismatic and basal surfaces at the interface was less probable.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crystal Growth & Design
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.5c00275
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geometrical Selection in an Array of Ice Crystals: A Comparison with Two-Dimensional Models

Crystal Growth & Design
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Geometrical Selection in an Array of Ice Crystals: A Comparison with Two-Dimensional Models

article en

Abstract

The tilt angle θ and the azimuthal angle α of the crystallographic c axes of ice crystals grown in a thin water layer were determined by using a cross-polarized transmission microscope and the birefringent properties of ice crystals. Ice microcrystals originated from ice grains obtained by mass crystallization of supercooled water inside a channel between two glass slides. The experimentally found two-angle distribution N(α, θ) of crystal orientations that remained after the process of cooperative growth exhibits some peculiarities that are not predicted by known two-dimensional (2D) models of geometrical selection: (1) Instead of a single peak at zero angles α and θ, N(α, θ) has coupled peaks shifted toward larger angles. We successfully explained this behavior by the effect of the thickening of ice crystals in the c direction during their cooperative growth. In contrast, the previous 2D models consider crystals as ideally thin needles which do not grow in the transverse direction. (2) The selectivity of the c axis orientations depends more on the increase of the α angle than on θ. N(α, θ) shows high values over a wide range of θ from 0° up to 70°, which is not taken into account by the 2D models considering needle-shaped or one-dimensional crystals. In this case, turning the crystal by an angle θ means rotating the needle around its longitudinal axis. This does not actually change the crystal orientation in the 2D space. We also found that the ice–water interfaces at 0 °C of the grown crystals mainly consisted of the bipyramidal surfaces, although individual ice crystals exhibited different values of α and θ. The appearance of crystals with the prismatic and basal surfaces at the interface was less probable.

Crystal Growth & Design
Hokkaido University (JP), B. Verkin Institute for Low Temperature Physics and Engineering of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (UA), PRG S&Tech (South Korea), N. I. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod (RU), College of Marin (US), Shanghai Maritime University (CN), Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.