Session 1. Transitions

Transitions? We talk about transitions every time we identify archaeological evidence that seems to interrupt a gradual cultural evolution process. Relevant examples are the transitions between the Upper Palaeolithic and Mesolithic, First (or Early) and Second (or Late) Mesolithic, Mesolithic and Neolithic, and so on. But, are we sure that the term transition is the most appropriate for all of these instances? In fact, a true transition is a long and gradual process, as observed for example in the Near East with the development of the PPN. Many of the changes that occurred in Europe at the beginning of the Holocene happened quite rapidly. Are we sure the word replacement would not be more fitting? Actually, the changes we observe from the perspective of material culture could have occurred with very different modalities and even differ consistently from one territory to another. This session welcomes contributions focused on relevant changes involving the Mesolithic period. In particular, we invite contributions presenting new data on “transitional periods” involving Mesolithic hunter-gatherer-fisher societies at different territorial scales, from regional trends to specific case studies. At the same time, we welcome synthesis works based on new analytical studies carried out by applying traditional as well as new methodologies, contributing to the current debate on the origin and development of the Mesolithic period by offering new interpretative perspectives.

Publication Details

Journal
Università degli Studi di Ferrara
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15160/1824-2707/3078
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Session 1. Transitions

Università degli Studi di Ferrara
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Session 1. Transitions

article en

Abstract

Transitions? We talk about transitions every time we identify archaeological evidence that seems to interrupt a gradual cultural evolution process. Relevant examples are the transitions between the Upper Palaeolithic and Mesolithic, First (or Early) and Second (or Late) Mesolithic, Mesolithic and Neolithic, and so on. But, are we sure that the term transition is the most appropriate for all of these instances? In fact, a true transition is a long and gradual process, as observed for example in the Near East with the development of the PPN. Many of the changes that occurred in Europe at the beginning of the Holocene happened quite rapidly. Are we sure the word replacement would not be more fitting? Actually, the changes we observe from the perspective of material culture could have occurred with very different modalities and even differ consistently from one territory to another. This session welcomes contributions focused on relevant changes involving the Mesolithic period. In particular, we invite contributions presenting new data on “transitional periods” involving Mesolithic hunter-gatherer-fisher societies at different territorial scales, from regional trends to specific case studies. At the same time, we welcome synthesis works based on new analytical studies carried out by applying traditional as well as new methodologies, contributing to the current debate on the origin and development of the Mesolithic period by offering new interpretative perspectives.

Università degli Studi di Ferrara
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.