Just Transformations – Embedding stakeholder engagement to mainstream nature-based solutions in freshwater ecosystems

The use of nature-based solutions (NbS) in freshwater restoration must ensure fair, active, and transparent involvement of diverse stakeholders, and balance the distribution of costs and benefits they incur. A synthesis of MERLIN NbS case study data, illustrated by six examples, shows that the way stakeholder engagement isdesigned and executed has critical implications for achieving such ‘just transformations’. The analyses focused on representation, procedure, and distribution. Representation analysis shows that a broad range of stakeholders were engaged, but public-sector stakeholders often dominated, which may result from their traditional role in natural resource conservation and environmental protection. Initiatives like case study boards and workshops promoted active stakeholder involvement, but community groups were often less actively engaged, reinforcing public-sector representation. NbS benefits were generally well communicated and positively perceived, but there was limited clarity regarding costs, beneficiaries, and compensation schemes for affected stakeholders. It is important to address the power dynamics and politics of restoration while building trust amongst stakeholders togalvanise support. Community groups and sceptical stakeholders need to be fully engaged and given space to voice concerns and to constructively find solutions. This requires significant time and resources. It also requires willingness to compromise. Engagement and decision-making approaches should respond to different stakeholders’ needs, while ensuring flexibility to involve a range of stakeholders properly. Capacity building for project leaders is critical to identify and address the root causes of opposition to NbS, low interest in participation and their implications for just transformations. This can help address low participation amongst some stakeholder groups. To enable early detection of gaps and timely corrective actions, stakeholder engagement should be planned from the outset with tools in place to systematically monitor and evaluate participation. Context is important, and each case study offers unique lessons, stressing there is no one-size-fits-all approach when implementing NbS within a just transformations framework.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17105029
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Just Transformations – Embedding stakeholder engagement to mainstream nature-based solutions in freshwater ecosystems

1 citations
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
article

Just Transformations – Embedding stakeholder engagement to mainstream nature-based solutions in freshwater ecosystems

article en
1 citations

Abstract

The use of nature-based solutions (NbS) in freshwater restoration must ensure fair, active, and transparent involvement of diverse stakeholders, and balance the distribution of costs and benefits they incur. A synthesis of MERLIN NbS case study data, illustrated by six examples, shows that the way stakeholder engagement isdesigned and executed has critical implications for achieving such ‘just transformations’. The analyses focused on representation, procedure, and distribution. Representation analysis shows that a broad range of stakeholders were engaged, but public-sector stakeholders often dominated, which may result from their traditional role in natural resource conservation and environmental protection. Initiatives like case study boards and workshops promoted active stakeholder involvement, but community groups were often less actively engaged, reinforcing public-sector representation. NbS benefits were generally well communicated and positively perceived, but there was limited clarity regarding costs, beneficiaries, and compensation schemes for affected stakeholders. It is important to address the power dynamics and politics of restoration while building trust amongst stakeholders togalvanise support. Community groups and sceptical stakeholders need to be fully engaged and given space to voice concerns and to constructively find solutions. This requires significant time and resources. It also requires willingness to compromise. Engagement and decision-making approaches should respond to different stakeholders’ needs, while ensuring flexibility to involve a range of stakeholders properly. Capacity building for project leaders is critical to identify and address the root causes of opposition to NbS, low interest in participation and their implications for just transformations. This can help address low participation amongst some stakeholder groups. To enable early detection of gaps and timely corrective actions, stakeholder engagement should be planned from the outset with tools in place to systematically monitor and evaluate participation. Context is important, and each case study offers unique lessons, stressing there is no one-size-fits-all approach when implementing NbS within a just transformations framework.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), University of Helsinki (FI), James Hutton Institute (GB), University of the Basque Country (ES), Warsaw University of Life Sciences (PL), Finnish Environment Institute (FI), Deltares (NL), WWF Hungary, University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.