Comparative Analysis of Facial Expression Recognition Using Image-Based and Landmark-Based Methods

This study compares the effectiveness of image-based and landmark-based methods for facial expression recognition (FER) in classifying hurt and normal facial expressions, utilizing datasets from the Delaware Pain Database and UTKFace. Five machine learning models are assessed, including convolutional neural networks (CNN), support vector machines (SVM), random forest classifier (RFC), logistic regression classifier (LRC), and gradient boosting classifier (GBC). The findings indicate that CNN achieves the highest accuracy at 95% when using landmark-based features, while SVM and GBC also perform admirably with these features. Conversely, LRC exhibits inconsistent results, especially when relying on image-based features. These findings offer valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, guiding the selection of effective FER techniques.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal Systems (Taiwan Association of Engineering and Technology Innovation)
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46604/aiti.2024.14589
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Facial Expression Recognition Using Image-Based and Landmark-Based Methods

Open Journal Systems (Taiwan Association of Engineering and Technology Innovation)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Comparative Analysis of Facial Expression Recognition Using Image-Based and Landmark-Based Methods

article en

Abstract

This study compares the effectiveness of image-based and landmark-based methods for facial expression recognition (FER) in classifying hurt and normal facial expressions, utilizing datasets from the Delaware Pain Database and UTKFace. Five machine learning models are assessed, including convolutional neural networks (CNN), support vector machines (SVM), random forest classifier (RFC), logistic regression classifier (LRC), and gradient boosting classifier (GBC). The findings indicate that CNN achieves the highest accuracy at 95% when using landmark-based features, while SVM and GBC also perform admirably with these features. Conversely, LRC exhibits inconsistent results, especially when relying on image-based features. These findings offer valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, guiding the selection of effective FER techniques.

Open Journal Systems (Taiwan Association of Engineering and Technology Innovation)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.