Feedback from co-designing innovative, low-herbicide-use systems with farmers: the role of tools in support of facilitation

Reducing herbicide use requires multiple changes in agricultural practices, thought at the cropping system scale. These combined changes have numerous effects (which may limit the adoption of such innovative practices) and make it difficult to assess them by expert assessment. Hence, we used various models (FLORSYS, DEXiPM) to evaluate cropping systems co-designed by groups of farmers. The presentation of the assessment results allowed to broaden the perspective (calculation of new indicators) and to consider long term issues (e.g., resilience of a system in the face of a peak in weed pressure). We also showed that it is possible to use, under certain conditions (available time, training and support, simplicity) a design aid tool (DECIFLORSYS) during the workshop. Using it during the workshop makes it possible to provide evaluation results more quickly, to improve the description of the co-designed innovative system and/or to stimulate the design of a new system to improve sustainable weed management performances.

Publication Details

Journal
SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17180/ciag-2025-vol101-art04-gb
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feedback from co-designing innovative, low-herbicide-use systems with farmers: the role of tools in support of facilitation

SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Feedback from co-designing innovative, low-herbicide-use systems with farmers: the role of tools in support of facilitation

article en

Abstract

Reducing herbicide use requires multiple changes in agricultural practices, thought at the cropping system scale. These combined changes have numerous effects (which may limit the adoption of such innovative practices) and make it difficult to assess them by expert assessment. Hence, we used various models (FLORSYS, DEXiPM) to evaluate cropping systems co-designed by groups of farmers. The presentation of the assessment results allowed to broaden the perspective (calculation of new indicators) and to consider long term issues (e.g., resilience of a system in the face of a peak in weed pressure). We also showed that it is possible to use, under certain conditions (available time, training and support, simplicity) a design aid tool (DECIFLORSYS) during the workshop. Using it during the workshop makes it possible to provide evaluation results more quickly, to improve the description of the co-designed innovative system and/or to stimulate the design of a new system to improve sustainable weed management performances.

SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.