Expert and Scientific Advice in Public Policymaking in Armenia

Addressing societal problems by relying on expert advice is commonplace in many developed countries. Two key tools are needed for effective decision-making: access to high-quality, real-time data and the integration of independent expert advice. These tools, it will be argued, are common in advanced democracies but scarce, in developing countries such as Armenia. The paper examines and analyses this shortcoming in four sections. The first section sets out some of the preconditions for high quality expert advice. Section two briefly discusses the legal regulations of expert advice mechanisms in Armenia. The third section highlights aspects of evidence-based policymaking in the United States as a benchmark. Section four illustrates how these principles could apply to Armenia’s health system using it as a case study. The paper concludes with some practical recommendations on how to incorporate expert advice into public policymaking in Armenia.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17009286
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expert and Scientific Advice in Public Policymaking in Armenia

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Expert and Scientific Advice in Public Policymaking in Armenia

article en

Abstract

Addressing societal problems by relying on expert advice is commonplace in many developed countries. Two key tools are needed for effective decision-making: access to high-quality, real-time data and the integration of independent expert advice. These tools, it will be argued, are common in advanced democracies but scarce, in developing countries such as Armenia. The paper examines and analyses this shortcoming in four sections. The first section sets out some of the preconditions for high quality expert advice. Section two briefly discusses the legal regulations of expert advice mechanisms in Armenia. The third section highlights aspects of evidence-based policymaking in the United States as a benchmark. Section four illustrates how these principles could apply to Armenia’s health system using it as a case study. The paper concludes with some practical recommendations on how to incorporate expert advice into public policymaking in Armenia.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (BA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.