Operational Efficiency of Advanced Surveying Tools: A Case Study

Today, with advanced surveying instruments, surveying has become easier and more powerful. Accuracy is a prime concern concerning the time and cost involved in surveying. The advanced surveying instruments perform differently in different locations depending on their specifications and functions, pertaining to time and cost. Hence, it is necessary to determine the performance of these instruments with respect to precision, time, and cost. The study aims to take measurements using advanced surveying instruments and compare them regarding accuracy, precision, and time requirements. For these three advanced surveying instruments, viz. Total Station (TS), Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS), and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) were used to take measurements on two study areas, viz., a college campus and agricultural land. The data collected was processed using Agisoft Metashape, Leica Infinity, and Leica Geo Office software. The result of taking measurements of two study areas using the instruments found that average variations in easting, northing, height, distance (of HCPs), bearing (of HCPs) and area of TS and DGPS are 0.012m, 0.016m, 0.014m, 0.021m, 25 sec and 3.184 sqm, respectively. The average variations in easting, northing, height, distance (of BP), and area of DGPS and drone are 0. 213m, 0.198m, 0.224m, 0.251m and 113.78 sqm, respectively, and that of TS and drone are 0.236m, 0.224m, 0.267m, 0.280m and 97.89 sqm, respectively. In comparing time expenditure, a Drone requires less time than a DGPS and TS. In comparison, the cost expenditure of the DGPS is twice as high as that of the other two instruments.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564801002/pdf
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Operational Efficiency of Advanced Surveying Tools: A Case Study

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Operational Efficiency of Advanced Surveying Tools: A Case Study

article en

Abstract

Today, with advanced surveying instruments, surveying has become easier and more powerful. Accuracy is a prime concern concerning the time and cost involved in surveying. The advanced surveying instruments perform differently in different locations depending on their specifications and functions, pertaining to time and cost. Hence, it is necessary to determine the performance of these instruments with respect to precision, time, and cost. The study aims to take measurements using advanced surveying instruments and compare them regarding accuracy, precision, and time requirements. For these three advanced surveying instruments, viz. Total Station (TS), Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS), and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) were used to take measurements on two study areas, viz., a college campus and agricultural land. The data collected was processed using Agisoft Metashape, Leica Infinity, and Leica Geo Office software. The result of taking measurements of two study areas using the instruments found that average variations in easting, northing, height, distance (of HCPs), bearing (of HCPs) and area of TS and DGPS are 0.012m, 0.016m, 0.014m, 0.021m, 25 sec and 3.184 sqm, respectively. The average variations in easting, northing, height, distance (of BP), and area of DGPS and drone are 0. 213m, 0.198m, 0.224m, 0.251m and 113.78 sqm, respectively, and that of TS and drone are 0.236m, 0.224m, 0.267m, 0.280m and 97.89 sqm, respectively. In comparing time expenditure, a Drone requires less time than a DGPS and TS. In comparison, the cost expenditure of the DGPS is twice as high as that of the other two instruments.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.