Comparative Analysis of Composite Column Capacity Estimation in International Codes

The primary function of a building, bridge or any structural system is to transmit loads safely from the superstructure to the foundation. The columns play a critical role in this function, and any inaccuracies in load prediction can lead to catastrophic damage. Hence, the evaluation of a column’s strength assumes considerable importance. Upon this premise, this research aimed to investigate the strength prediction of M40 grade concrete columns subjected to uniaxial compression loading. The experimental loading capacities of various columns were compared with the evaluated loads as per the Indian Standard code (IS 456:2000), British Standard (BS 8110-1:1997), American Concrete Institute (ACI 318-14) and European Standard (EN 1994-1-1 (2004)). It was observed that the partial safety factors and design philosophies in these codes were different. The experimental results suggested that the load-carrying capacities experimentally determined of the tested columns compare well with the capacities recommended by the IS code and the BS code for columns. In contrast, the other two codes have vastly different column capacity assessments due to higher partial safety factors. It is concluded that all four codes have evolved based on different design philosophies and, hence, have varying partial safety factors. Thus, a direct code comparison is not appropriate.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564801008/pdf
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Composite Column Capacity Estimation in International Codes

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Comparative Analysis of Composite Column Capacity Estimation in International Codes

article en

Abstract

The primary function of a building, bridge or any structural system is to transmit loads safely from the superstructure to the foundation. The columns play a critical role in this function, and any inaccuracies in load prediction can lead to catastrophic damage. Hence, the evaluation of a column’s strength assumes considerable importance. Upon this premise, this research aimed to investigate the strength prediction of M40 grade concrete columns subjected to uniaxial compression loading. The experimental loading capacities of various columns were compared with the evaluated loads as per the Indian Standard code (IS 456:2000), British Standard (BS 8110-1:1997), American Concrete Institute (ACI 318-14) and European Standard (EN 1994-1-1 (2004)). It was observed that the partial safety factors and design philosophies in these codes were different. The experimental results suggested that the load-carrying capacities experimentally determined of the tested columns compare well with the capacities recommended by the IS code and the BS code for columns. In contrast, the other two codes have vastly different column capacity assessments due to higher partial safety factors. It is concluded that all four codes have evolved based on different design philosophies and, hence, have varying partial safety factors. Thus, a direct code comparison is not appropriate.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.