Distinguishing Between the Crime of Inciting or Facilitating Suicide and the Criminal Offense of Homicide

Abstract: The two offenses result in the death of a person, except where the offense of incitement or facilitation of suicide results in an attempted suicide. Sometimes, in practice, the manner of commission is very similar and it is difficult to establish the correct legal classification, so that it can be accurately determined whether a particular situation falls within one of the two offences, the line of demarcation being very fine. This scientific approach aims to delimit these crimes, specifying that incitement or facilitation of suicide is not assisted suicide, particularly given the dual nature of suicide, as defined in the “texting suicide case” (Commonwealth v. Carter, 52 N.E.3d 1054, 1056–57 (Mass. 2016)) where suicide is seen both as harm to be prevented and as an individual choice to be respected. This raises the question of where the line should be drawn between determining or facilitating suicide and murder, and what the standards of foreseeability should be. Keywords: Criminal Law, Determining or Facilitating Suicide, Murder

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16219200
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinguishing Between the Crime of Inciting or Facilitating Suicide and the Criminal Offense of Homicide

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Distinguishing Between the Crime of Inciting or Facilitating Suicide and the Criminal Offense of Homicide

article en

Abstract

Abstract: The two offenses result in the death of a person, except where the offense of incitement or facilitation of suicide results in an attempted suicide. Sometimes, in practice, the manner of commission is very similar and it is difficult to establish the correct legal classification, so that it can be accurately determined whether a particular situation falls within one of the two offences, the line of demarcation being very fine. This scientific approach aims to delimit these crimes, specifying that incitement or facilitation of suicide is not assisted suicide, particularly given the dual nature of suicide, as defined in the “texting suicide case” (Commonwealth v. Carter, 52 N.E.3d 1054, 1056–57 (Mass. 2016)) where suicide is seen both as harm to be prevented and as an individual choice to be respected. This raises the question of where the line should be drawn between determining or facilitating suicide and murder, and what the standards of foreseeability should be. Keywords: Criminal Law, Determining or Facilitating Suicide, Murder

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Distinguishing Between the Crime of Inciting or Facilitating Suicide and the Criminal Offense of Homicide · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS