STUFFLEBEAM'S CIPP MODEL OF EVALUATION

Evaluation is a central element in the teaching and learning process, yet it is often narrowly practiced in Nigerian schools as summative testing focused on grades and examinations. Such traditional approaches have been widely criticized for neglecting the contextual, instructional, and systemic factors that shape student outcomes, particularly in science education where performance and engagement continue to decline. This study explores the Stufflebeam CIPP (Context, Input, Process and Product) model as a holistic and decision-oriented alternative to conventional evaluation methods. The model emphasizes continuous improvement by interrogating not only results but also the needs, resources, processes, and impacts of educational programs. Drawing from empirical and theoretical literature, the work highlights how the CIPP framework can enhance curriculum delivery, teacher training, student assessment, and school improvement practices in Nigeria. It further analyzes contemporary adaptations of the model, including digital, culturally responsive, and sustainability-focused versions, thereby underscoring its flexibility in modern educational contexts. While challenges such as resource limitations, lack of evaluator expertise, and systemic resistance to data-driven decision-making remain, the study concludes that institutional commitment, evaluator capacity building, and integration of technology can foster effective adoption. Ultimately, the CIPP model offers Nigerian schools a pathway from judgmental evaluation toward developmental, evidence-based practices that support accountability, inclusivity, and long-term educational transformation

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17086858
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

STUFFLEBEAM'S CIPP MODEL OF EVALUATION

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

STUFFLEBEAM'S CIPP MODEL OF EVALUATION

article en

Abstract

Evaluation is a central element in the teaching and learning process, yet it is often narrowly practiced in Nigerian schools as summative testing focused on grades and examinations. Such traditional approaches have been widely criticized for neglecting the contextual, instructional, and systemic factors that shape student outcomes, particularly in science education where performance and engagement continue to decline. This study explores the Stufflebeam CIPP (Context, Input, Process and Product) model as a holistic and decision-oriented alternative to conventional evaluation methods. The model emphasizes continuous improvement by interrogating not only results but also the needs, resources, processes, and impacts of educational programs. Drawing from empirical and theoretical literature, the work highlights how the CIPP framework can enhance curriculum delivery, teacher training, student assessment, and school improvement practices in Nigeria. It further analyzes contemporary adaptations of the model, including digital, culturally responsive, and sustainability-focused versions, thereby underscoring its flexibility in modern educational contexts. While challenges such as resource limitations, lack of evaluator expertise, and systemic resistance to data-driven decision-making remain, the study concludes that institutional commitment, evaluator capacity building, and integration of technology can foster effective adoption. Ultimately, the CIPP model offers Nigerian schools a pathway from judgmental evaluation toward developmental, evidence-based practices that support accountability, inclusivity, and long-term educational transformation

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Godfrey Okoye University (NG)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.