HEGEL, LAS CASAS, AND THE ERASURE OF PARTICULARITY: THE PEDAGOGICAL COERCION OF THE BARBARIAN

We follow Hegel’s description of the barbarian as a natural being, incapable of freedom and thereby a threat to its Idea, achieved only in European culture. The alternatives left for her in the modern world are either assimilation to the universality of the European by means of a civilizing mission (pedagogical coercion) through which she must lose her particularity, or physical extermination. Either way, her concreteness cannot withstand the universality of reason and freedom. In contrast, Bartolomé de las Casas in his 1550 debate with Ginés de Sepúlveda offers various strategies with which he attempts to save native cultures from both assimilation and extermination. In opposition to Hegel, what is under threat for las Casas, and requires absolute sovereignty instead of pedagogical coercion, is not the universal idea of freedom but the concrete existence of native communities

Publication Details

Journal
1000 Functional Connectomes Project
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25430/pupj-verifiche-2025-1-2-18
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HEGEL, LAS CASAS, AND THE ERASURE OF PARTICULARITY: THE PEDAGOGICAL COERCION OF THE BARBARIAN

1000 Functional Connectomes Project
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

HEGEL, LAS CASAS, AND THE ERASURE OF PARTICULARITY: THE PEDAGOGICAL COERCION OF THE BARBARIAN

article en

Abstract

We follow Hegel’s description of the barbarian as a natural being, incapable of freedom and thereby a threat to its Idea, achieved only in European culture. The alternatives left for her in the modern world are either assimilation to the universality of the European by means of a civilizing mission (pedagogical coercion) through which she must lose her particularity, or physical extermination. Either way, her concreteness cannot withstand the universality of reason and freedom. In contrast, Bartolomé de las Casas in his 1550 debate with Ginés de Sepúlveda offers various strategies with which he attempts to save native cultures from both assimilation and extermination. In opposition to Hegel, what is under threat for las Casas, and requires absolute sovereignty instead of pedagogical coercion, is not the universal idea of freedom but the concrete existence of native communities

1000 Functional Connectomes Project
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.