Traditions in Transition: Gurukul vs. Buddhist Education Systems

This article examines the distinctive educational paradigms of the Gurukul and Buddhist education systems in ancient India, highlighting their philosophical foundations, institutional structures, and pedagogical methodologies. The Gurukul system, rooted in the Vedic tradition, emphasises personalised, residential learning aimed at holistic human development and character formation through moral education. In contrast, the Buddhist education model promotes an egalitarian and institutionalised approach centred on universal enlightenment and compassion. While both systems share the overarching goal of fostering profound human development, they differ significantly in their accessibility and philosophical underpinnings. Through a detailed and nuanced analysis, this paper synthesises scholarly material to elucidate the complexities and interrelations of these two influential educational frameworks, ultimately demonstrating their enduring impact on contemporary educational discourse and policy.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17078429
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traditions in Transition: Gurukul vs. Buddhist Education Systems

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Traditions in Transition: Gurukul vs. Buddhist Education Systems

article en

Abstract

This article examines the distinctive educational paradigms of the Gurukul and Buddhist education systems in ancient India, highlighting their philosophical foundations, institutional structures, and pedagogical methodologies. The Gurukul system, rooted in the Vedic tradition, emphasises personalised, residential learning aimed at holistic human development and character formation through moral education. In contrast, the Buddhist education model promotes an egalitarian and institutionalised approach centred on universal enlightenment and compassion. While both systems share the overarching goal of fostering profound human development, they differ significantly in their accessibility and philosophical underpinnings. Through a detailed and nuanced analysis, this paper synthesises scholarly material to elucidate the complexities and interrelations of these two influential educational frameworks, ultimately demonstrating their enduring impact on contemporary educational discourse and policy.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.