The Sociology of End-of-Life Care and the Right to Die.

The article takes a sociological look at end of life care, examininghow death, dying and grief are caused by politics and culture. The Sociologyof End-of-Life Care is less than two decades old, as the field that studiesdying with dignity, the medicalization of death, hospice, in home care, andinstitutional care evolve. The history of the right-to-die advocacy movementin the US documents a shifting public discourse: from refusal of treatment,ultimately the right to request a physician-administered death in cases ofterminal illness. This article analyses social movements that shape and contest access to deathwith dignity as well as the neoliberal framing of the right to die. It arguesthat dying has become more privatized, medicalized and technologized,exiling it from the cultural, communal and spiritual dimensions of loss. Thereare worries about one-size-fits-all models of end-of-life care because theymay complicate things for patients, families and communities.In the end, the paper shows that we must attend to the meanings of a “gooddeath”, dignity at dying and family closure. But we must pay more attentionto social equity in health policy design.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17077284
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Sociology of End-of-Life Care and the Right to Die.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

The Sociology of End-of-Life Care and the Right to Die.

article en

Abstract

The article takes a sociological look at end of life care, examininghow death, dying and grief are caused by politics and culture. The Sociologyof End-of-Life Care is less than two decades old, as the field that studiesdying with dignity, the medicalization of death, hospice, in home care, andinstitutional care evolve. The history of the right-to-die advocacy movementin the US documents a shifting public discourse: from refusal of treatment,ultimately the right to request a physician-administered death in cases ofterminal illness. This article analyses social movements that shape and contest access to deathwith dignity as well as the neoliberal framing of the right to die. It arguesthat dying has become more privatized, medicalized and technologized,exiling it from the cultural, communal and spiritual dimensions of loss. Thereare worries about one-size-fits-all models of end-of-life care because theymay complicate things for patients, families and communities.In the end, the paper shows that we must attend to the meanings of a “gooddeath”, dignity at dying and family closure. But we must pay more attentionto social equity in health policy design.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), Islamic University (BD)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Sociology of End-of-Life Care and the Right to Die. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS