Our Crime, Our Justice: International Head of State Immunity and the Malabo Protocol

Gulin Ustabas’ human rights capstone centers around the legal immunity offered to leaders of nations as a way of preventing them from being prosecuted by international courts and how this captures one of the central tensions in international criminal law: the balance between justice and peace. She specifically focuses on the case between the African Union (AU) and the International Criminal Court (ICC) with the introduction of the Malabo Protocol by the AU, which seeks to expand the jurisdiction of the AU’s regional court and the African Court of Justice and Human Rights (ACJHR) to include a regional criminal court. Ustabas further seeks to understand the dispute over this immunity law and to what effect the African opposition has altered this customary international protocol. She argues that the African opposition to the immunity law is concerned with not the law itself, but rather with how the law has been used in a way that produced several grievances by African states, from the issue of the disruption of peace processes to double standards.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stanford Digital Repository
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25740/sr826ky5359
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Our Crime, Our Justice: International Head of State Immunity and the Malabo Protocol

Stanford Digital Repository
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Our Crime, Our Justice: International Head of State Immunity and the Malabo Protocol

article en

Abstract

Gulin Ustabas’ human rights capstone centers around the legal immunity offered to leaders of nations as a way of preventing them from being prosecuted by international courts and how this captures one of the central tensions in international criminal law: the balance between justice and peace. She specifically focuses on the case between the African Union (AU) and the International Criminal Court (ICC) with the introduction of the Malabo Protocol by the AU, which seeks to expand the jurisdiction of the AU’s regional court and the African Court of Justice and Human Rights (ACJHR) to include a regional criminal court. Ustabas further seeks to understand the dispute over this immunity law and to what effect the African opposition has altered this customary international protocol. She argues that the African opposition to the immunity law is concerned with not the law itself, but rather with how the law has been used in a way that produced several grievances by African states, from the issue of the disruption of peace processes to double standards.

Stanford Digital Repository
Stanford University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.