Management control and quality indicators in healthcare: a literature review

Abstract This paper reviews recent literature on management control systems (MCSs) and quality indicators (QIs) in healthcare to assess how they contribute to improving organizational efficiency and patient outcomes. Using a systematic literature review (SLR) approach based on the PRISMA methodology, articles were retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science databases covering the period 2000–2024. A total of 68 peer-reviewed studies were included after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria related to management control, healthcare quality, and performance evaluation. The findings show that traditional control tools (budgeting, variance analysis, financial dashboards) remain dominant but are increasingly complemented by modern approaches such as the Balanced Scorecard, performance dashboards, and benchmarking practices. The literature highlights three recurrent quality indicators: waiting times, readmission rates, and patient satisfaction, which represent both quantitative and qualitative dimensions of performance. However, the review also reveals major challenges in implementing MCSs, including high costs, technical complexity, and staff resistance. The main conclusion is that integrating financial and non-financial metrics through comprehensive control systems strengthens healthcare quality and organizational performance, but future research must address contextual barriers in developing countries to ensure broader applicability. Keywords: Management control, healthcare quality, Balanced Scorecard, patient satisfaction, Key Performance Indicators.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17080026
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management control and quality indicators in healthcare: a literature review

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Management control and quality indicators in healthcare: a literature review

article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper reviews recent literature on management control systems (MCSs) and quality indicators (QIs) in healthcare to assess how they contribute to improving organizational efficiency and patient outcomes. Using a systematic literature review (SLR) approach based on the PRISMA methodology, articles were retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science databases covering the period 2000–2024. A total of 68 peer-reviewed studies were included after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria related to management control, healthcare quality, and performance evaluation. The findings show that traditional control tools (budgeting, variance analysis, financial dashboards) remain dominant but are increasingly complemented by modern approaches such as the Balanced Scorecard, performance dashboards, and benchmarking practices. The literature highlights three recurrent quality indicators: waiting times, readmission rates, and patient satisfaction, which represent both quantitative and qualitative dimensions of performance. However, the review also reveals major challenges in implementing MCSs, including high costs, technical complexity, and staff resistance. The main conclusion is that integrating financial and non-financial metrics through comprehensive control systems strengthens healthcare quality and organizational performance, but future research must address contextual barriers in developing countries to ensure broader applicability. Keywords: Management control, healthcare quality, Balanced Scorecard, patient satisfaction, Key Performance Indicators.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.