Comparative Analysis of Clustering Algorithms for NOUL Entrance Examination Data

The main objective of this study is to compare machine learning techniques for clustering, specifically using the K-Means and DBSCAN algorithms. The paper involved building, testing, and evaluating clustering models on real-world data. The dataset, collected from the National University Entrance examination (2014-2015), contains 15,602 samples. The Elbow method was applied to determine the optimal k value for K-Means, while the optimal epsilon value was used for DBSCAN. Python served as the development environment. The results showed that the K-Means model produced three clusters with a silhouette coefficient of 0.457, while DBSCAN achieved a higher silhouette score of 0.484. Therefore, DBSCAN outperformed K-Means in clustering performance.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17078475
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Clustering Algorithms for NOUL Entrance Examination Data

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Comparative Analysis of Clustering Algorithms for NOUL Entrance Examination Data

article en

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to compare machine learning techniques for clustering, specifically using the K-Means and DBSCAN algorithms. The paper involved building, testing, and evaluating clustering models on real-world data. The dataset, collected from the National University Entrance examination (2014-2015), contains 15,602 samples. The Elbow method was applied to determine the optimal k value for K-Means, while the optimal epsilon value was used for DBSCAN. Python served as the development environment. The results showed that the K-Means model produced three clusters with a silhouette coefficient of 0.457, while DBSCAN achieved a higher silhouette score of 0.484. Therefore, DBSCAN outperformed K-Means in clustering performance.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.