Rethinking China’s Emerging Case Law System : Empirical Insights and Challenges to Prevailing Assumptions

This paper examines China’s emerging case law system through an empirical analysis of more than 10,000 court judgments issued between 2019 and 2021. It challenges prevailing academic views that Guiding Cases are ‘de facto binding’ on Chinese courts and that China’s case law system could be interpreted through a common law lens. Instead, the study shows that the Chinese approach is characterised by distinct objectives, methodologies, and applications. The paper further highlights the practice of ‘mandatory search for similar cases’, which has substantially expanded the role of cases in judicial decision-making. China’s case law system remains in its formative stages, marked by notable uncertainties and challenges. This research underscores the importance of sustained empirical inquiry into legal rules and practices to better understand the trajectory of China’s case law system and the broader implications of this novel approach for contemporary judicial practice.

Publication Details

Journal
Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Published
2025-12-31
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking China’s Emerging Case Law System : Empirical Insights and Challenges to Prevailing Assumptions

Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Rethinking China’s Emerging Case Law System : Empirical Insights and Challenges to Prevailing Assumptions

article en

Abstract

This paper examines China’s emerging case law system through an empirical analysis of more than 10,000 court judgments issued between 2019 and 2021. It challenges prevailing academic views that Guiding Cases are ‘de facto binding’ on Chinese courts and that China’s case law system could be interpreted through a common law lens. Instead, the study shows that the Chinese approach is characterised by distinct objectives, methodologies, and applications. The paper further highlights the practice of ‘mandatory search for similar cases’, which has substantially expanded the role of cases in judicial decision-making. China’s case law system remains in its formative stages, marked by notable uncertainties and challenges. This research underscores the importance of sustained empirical inquiry into legal rules and practices to better understand the trajectory of China’s case law system and the broader implications of this novel approach for contemporary judicial practice.

Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Beijing Jiaotong University, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.