Contact Ruptures: How Ecological Shifts Reshape Intergroup Contact and Outgroup Attitudes

Intergroup contact is regarded as a powerful tool for reducing prejudice. However, recent research has questioned the ability of naturalistic contact to produce true within-person attitude change – that is, shifts in an individual’s attitudes over time. Much of this work has focused on minor variations in routine intergroup contact, which may be too subtle to produce meaningful, lasting change. Conducted in the UK, this research explores two instances of ‘contact ruptures’ where individuals undergo abrupt environmental changes that disrupt existing social networks and substantially alter their amount of intergroup contact, such as when starting university (Study 1, N = 429, 4 waves) or studying abroad (Study 2, N = 373, 4 waves). Using latent growth models, we find both transitions led to significant and sustained step-level changes in levels of contact with people of different nationalities. Individuals experiencing larger post-rupture increases in positive contact showed more favourable shifts in outgroup attitudes, while greater increases in negative contact coincided with greater declines in positive attitudes. Additionally, higher increases in intimate contact, but not casual contact, were associated with greater improvements in attitudes. Findings suggest that the trait-like stability observed in recent studies may stem not only from trait-like features of the individual but also from stable environments. Within-person attitude change is evident when people experience major shifts in contact. We argue that focusing on substantial changes, rather than day-to-day variations better aligns with how contact effects were originally conceived of in Allport’s classic contact theory (yet have not been routinely studied).

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-24
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contact Ruptures: How Ecological Shifts Reshape Intergroup Contact and Outgroup Attitudes

Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Contact Ruptures: How Ecological Shifts Reshape Intergroup Contact and Outgroup Attitudes

article en

Abstract

Intergroup contact is regarded as a powerful tool for reducing prejudice. However, recent research has questioned the ability of naturalistic contact to produce true within-person attitude change – that is, shifts in an individual’s attitudes over time. Much of this work has focused on minor variations in routine intergroup contact, which may be too subtle to produce meaningful, lasting change. Conducted in the UK, this research explores two instances of ‘contact ruptures’ where individuals undergo abrupt environmental changes that disrupt existing social networks and substantially alter their amount of intergroup contact, such as when starting university (Study 1, N = 429, 4 waves) or studying abroad (Study 2, N = 373, 4 waves). Using latent growth models, we find both transitions led to significant and sustained step-level changes in levels of contact with people of different nationalities. Individuals experiencing larger post-rupture increases in positive contact showed more favourable shifts in outgroup attitudes, while greater increases in negative contact coincided with greater declines in positive attitudes. Additionally, higher increases in intimate contact, but not casual contact, were associated with greater improvements in attitudes. Findings suggest that the trait-like stability observed in recent studies may stem not only from trait-like features of the individual but also from stable environments. Within-person attitude change is evident when people experience major shifts in contact. We argue that focusing on substantial changes, rather than day-to-day variations better aligns with how contact effects were originally conceived of in Allport’s classic contact theory (yet have not been routinely studied).

Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.