A Landmark Climate Decision: Verein Klimaseniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland and the New Standard for Victim Status

This article explores the landmark decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland, addressing climate change within the framework of human rights. It critically examines the evolving standards for victim status, highlighting the Court’s contentious recognition of an NGO as a victim under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The discussion delves into the severity threshold for environmental harm and the complexities of attributing state responsibility for climate change. The analysis underscores the tension between legal interpretation and policy-making, raising important questions about the limits of judicial intervention in global climate governance.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OJS MenschenRechtsMagazin
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60935/mrm2025.30.1.18
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Landmark Climate Decision: Verein Klimaseniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland and the New Standard for Victim Status

OJS MenschenRechtsMagazin
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

A Landmark Climate Decision: Verein Klimaseniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland and the New Standard for Victim Status

article en

Abstract

This article explores the landmark decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland, addressing climate change within the framework of human rights. It critically examines the evolving standards for victim status, highlighting the Court’s contentious recognition of an NGO as a victim under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The discussion delves into the severity threshold for environmental harm and the complexities of attributing state responsibility for climate change. The analysis underscores the tension between legal interpretation and policy-making, raising important questions about the limits of judicial intervention in global climate governance.

OJS MenschenRechtsMagazin
Academy of Public Administration (AZ)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.