Introduction to ‘The Basic Law of Social Development’ by Julius Dickmann

In 1932, Julius Dickmann self-published a revision to the Marxist account of revolutionary historical change. Arguing that previous modes of production had not caused revolutions because of confrontations between expanding productive forces and fettering relations of production, Dickmann held that the contradiction in historical modes of production was between expanding productive forces and their natural limits. Modes of production faced ecological crises, necessitating changes in the relations of production that then spurred the productive forces. Dickmann argued that this model explained the emergence and decline of antiquity and feudalism. Analogously, capitalism was stagnating because it was running up against natural limits. Monopolisation was not a symptom of overripe capitalism heralding socialism in germ, but a necessary response to the danger of overexploiting fossil fuels. Only by working with an understanding of these fetters could socialists hope to stimulate new post-capitalist forces of production and accelerate the transition to socialism.

Publication Details

Journal
London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Published
2025-09-30
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introduction to ‘The Basic Law of Social Development’ by Julius Dickmann

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Introduction to ‘The Basic Law of Social Development’ by Julius Dickmann

article en

Abstract

In 1932, Julius Dickmann self-published a revision to the Marxist account of revolutionary historical change. Arguing that previous modes of production had not caused revolutions because of confrontations between expanding productive forces and fettering relations of production, Dickmann held that the contradiction in historical modes of production was between expanding productive forces and their natural limits. Modes of production faced ecological crises, necessitating changes in the relations of production that then spurred the productive forces. Dickmann argued that this model explained the emergence and decline of antiquity and feudalism. Analogously, capitalism was stagnating because it was running up against natural limits. Monopolisation was not a symptom of overripe capitalism heralding socialism in germ, but a necessary response to the danger of overexploiting fossil fuels. Only by working with an understanding of these fetters could socialists hope to stimulate new post-capitalist forces of production and accelerate the transition to socialism.

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.