Analyzing Option Chain Bid–Ask Spreads with Machine Learning

This paper investigates the determinants of option bid–ask spreads using machine learning techniques. We analyze a cross-sectional dataset of Apple Inc. (AAPL) call options, focusing on the relative bid–ask spread as the target variable. By comparing linear models with ensemble methods such as Random Forests and XGBoost, we find that nonlinear machine learning methods significantly outperform traditional OLS regression. The most influential factors are moneyness, implied volatility, and time to expiration, while volume and open interest have limited predictive power. Results suggest that spreads are driven by a mix of market microstructure dynamics, capital constraints, and regulatory requirements such as FINRA Rule 4210. Our findings highlight the value of ML in financial microstructure modeling and offer insights relevant to traders, regulators, and liquidity providers.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin)
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21427/wsje-3269
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing Option Chain Bid–Ask Spreads with Machine Learning

Arrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Analyzing Option Chain Bid–Ask Spreads with Machine Learning

article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the determinants of option bid–ask spreads using machine learning techniques. We analyze a cross-sectional dataset of Apple Inc. (AAPL) call options, focusing on the relative bid–ask spread as the target variable. By comparing linear models with ensemble methods such as Random Forests and XGBoost, we find that nonlinear machine learning methods significantly outperform traditional OLS regression. The most influential factors are moneyness, implied volatility, and time to expiration, while volume and open interest have limited predictive power. Results suggest that spreads are driven by a mix of market microstructure dynamics, capital constraints, and regulatory requirements such as FINRA Rule 4210. Our findings highlight the value of ML in financial microstructure modeling and offer insights relevant to traders, regulators, and liquidity providers.

Arrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin)
Technological University Dublin (IE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.