Treatment approaches for non-metastatic small cell bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of reconstructed Kaplan-Meier curves.

Introduction Small cell bladder cancer is an aggressive histological subtype and represents one of the most common extra-pulmonary small cell carcinomas. Treatment options include radical cystectomy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or combinations of these three. However, the optimal treatment approach remains unknown. This meta-analysis assesses the current literature on non-metastatic SCBC and analyzes different treatment approaches.Methods A comprehensive search was conducted in four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) utilizing the search terms "small or neuroendocrine AND cancer OR Carcinoma OR Tumor OR Malignan* OR oncolog* OR metastati* OR neoplasm AND bladder or urothelial or Urologic" from inception until March 2024. Eligible papers reported treatment and overall survival (OS) of non-metastatic SCBC patients. A meta-analysis was conducted comparing treatments with radical cystectomy- and radiotherapy-based approaches in addition to the use of chemotherapy.Results In total, 12 articles were included in the present systematic review and meta-analysis. Regarding the comparison between radical cystectomy-based treatment and radiotherapy-based treatment, comparable OS was observed between both groups as the reported hazard ratio (HR) was found to be 1.04 (95 % confidence intervals [CI]: 0.90, 1.20, p = 0.6). After including chemotherapy in the analysis, it was observed that using radical cystectomy or radiotherapy with the addition of chemotherapy showed better OS with lower HR (0.53 [95 %CI: 0.39, 0.73], p < 0.0001) compared with radical cystectomy or radiotherapy without chemotherapy. The median OS of radical cystectomy or radiotherapy with chemotherapy was higher than that of radical cystectomy or radiotherapy without chemotherapy, and chemotherapy alone as follows: 30.89 (95 %CI: 23.82, 40.08), 19.67 (95 %CI: 16.26, 23.80), and 19.20 (95 %CI: 16.55, 22.28), respectively.Conclusion In this systematic review and meta-analysis, no OS difference was observed in patients undergoing radical cystectomy-based or radiotherapy-based treatments. The addition of chemotherapy to local therapy seems to improve OS. However, given the high heterogeneity of the included studies, these results should be interpreted cautiously.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/91110
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment approaches for non-metastatic small cell bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of reconstructed Kaplan-Meier curves.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Treatment approaches for non-metastatic small cell bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of reconstructed Kaplan-Meier curves.

article en

Abstract

Introduction Small cell bladder cancer is an aggressive histological subtype and represents one of the most common extra-pulmonary small cell carcinomas. Treatment options include radical cystectomy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or combinations of these three. However, the optimal treatment approach remains unknown. This meta-analysis assesses the current literature on non-metastatic SCBC and analyzes different treatment approaches.Methods A comprehensive search was conducted in four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) utilizing the search terms "small or neuroendocrine AND cancer OR Carcinoma OR Tumor OR Malignan* OR oncolog* OR metastati* OR neoplasm AND bladder or urothelial or Urologic" from inception until March 2024. Eligible papers reported treatment and overall survival (OS) of non-metastatic SCBC patients. A meta-analysis was conducted comparing treatments with radical cystectomy- and radiotherapy-based approaches in addition to the use of chemotherapy.Results In total, 12 articles were included in the present systematic review and meta-analysis. Regarding the comparison between radical cystectomy-based treatment and radiotherapy-based treatment, comparable OS was observed between both groups as the reported hazard ratio (HR) was found to be 1.04 (95 % confidence intervals [CI]: 0.90, 1.20, p = 0.6). After including chemotherapy in the analysis, it was observed that using radical cystectomy or radiotherapy with the addition of chemotherapy showed better OS with lower HR (0.53 [95 %CI: 0.39, 0.73], p < 0.0001) compared with radical cystectomy or radiotherapy without chemotherapy. The median OS of radical cystectomy or radiotherapy with chemotherapy was higher than that of radical cystectomy or radiotherapy without chemotherapy, and chemotherapy alone as follows: 30.89 (95 %CI: 23.82, 40.08), 19.67 (95 %CI: 16.26, 23.80), and 19.20 (95 %CI: 16.55, 22.28), respectively.Conclusion In this systematic review and meta-analysis, no OS difference was observed in patients undergoing radical cystectomy-based or radiotherapy-based treatments. The addition of chemotherapy to local therapy seems to improve OS. However, given the high heterogeneity of the included studies, these results should be interpreted cautiously.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.