Comparing Random Forest and Regression Models for Dust Storm Assessment in Kermanshah Province, Iran

Identifying dust sources is essential for effective management. This study employs remote sensing and machine learning techniques, specifically Random Forest Model (RFM) and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), to identify dust production areas in Kermanshah province from 2000 to 2020. The results indicate that the Random Forest Model (RFM) outperforms Multiple Linear Regression (MLR). Specifically, the accuracy of the RFM, with a correlation coefficient of 0.900, is significantly higher than that of the MLR, which has a correlation coefficient of 0.840. Furthermore, the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for the RFM was 5.59, whereas for the MLR it was 7.05, confirming the superiority of the RFM’s accuracy. Key factors influencing dust production include elevation, erosion, soil moisture, land cover, geology, daytime land surface temperature, and NDVI. The western and southwestern regions have been identified as hotspots for dust production. These findings can assist policymakers in effectively allocating resources and managing dust-related issues. Hazard zoning maps will facilitate the identification of areas requiring immediate intervention.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OICC Press Journals
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57647/j.jap.2025.0901.07
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Random Forest and Regression Models for Dust Storm Assessment in Kermanshah Province, Iran

OICC Press Journals
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Comparing Random Forest and Regression Models for Dust Storm Assessment in Kermanshah Province, Iran

article en

Abstract

Identifying dust sources is essential for effective management. This study employs remote sensing and machine learning techniques, specifically Random Forest Model (RFM) and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), to identify dust production areas in Kermanshah province from 2000 to 2020. The results indicate that the Random Forest Model (RFM) outperforms Multiple Linear Regression (MLR). Specifically, the accuracy of the RFM, with a correlation coefficient of 0.900, is significantly higher than that of the MLR, which has a correlation coefficient of 0.840. Furthermore, the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for the RFM was 5.59, whereas for the MLR it was 7.05, confirming the superiority of the RFM’s accuracy. Key factors influencing dust production include elevation, erosion, soil moisture, land cover, geology, daytime land surface temperature, and NDVI. The western and southwestern regions have been identified as hotspots for dust production. These findings can assist policymakers in effectively allocating resources and managing dust-related issues. Hazard zoning maps will facilitate the identification of areas requiring immediate intervention.

OICC Press Journals
Islamic Azad University of Hamedan (IR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing Random Forest and Regression Models for Dust Storm Assessment in Kermanshah Province, Iran · OICC Press Journals (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS