The Cinematic Brain: Between Deleuze and Bellour

This article aims to make some sense of Gilles Deleuze’s conception of the brain and show how it not only provides a framework for his film-philosophy, but also connects issues raised in his cinema books to the major abiding themes of his overall project. I consider in detail how the work of Raymond Bellour elucidates the contours of Deleuze’s concept of the brain by showing the various ways in which it builds upon ideas from science, philosophy, and art (including, of course, film). It also shows how the cinematic brain, no longer conceived as a mere fleshy organ, provides one way to theorize an expanded notion of cinema to include video and new electronic media. This brain also provides clues to both Deleuze’s and Bellour’s non-Freudian concepts of the unconscious. However, while Bellour perhaps goes the furthest in describing the contours of the Deleuzian brain, his reliance on hypnosis – which he employs in order to move beyond psychoanalysis – ultimately betrays key aspects of Deleuze’s cinematic philosophy, especially the ethical and political implications we find in the conclusion of Cinema 2.

Publication Details

Journal
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26262/gramma.v30i0.10749
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Cinematic Brain: Between Deleuze and Bellour

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

The Cinematic Brain: Between Deleuze and Bellour

article en

Abstract

This article aims to make some sense of Gilles Deleuze’s conception of the brain and show how it not only provides a framework for his film-philosophy, but also connects issues raised in his cinema books to the major abiding themes of his overall project. I consider in detail how the work of Raymond Bellour elucidates the contours of Deleuze’s concept of the brain by showing the various ways in which it builds upon ideas from science, philosophy, and art (including, of course, film). It also shows how the cinematic brain, no longer conceived as a mere fleshy organ, provides one way to theorize an expanded notion of cinema to include video and new electronic media. This brain also provides clues to both Deleuze’s and Bellour’s non-Freudian concepts of the unconscious. However, while Bellour perhaps goes the furthest in describing the contours of the Deleuzian brain, his reliance on hypnosis – which he employs in order to move beyond psychoanalysis – ultimately betrays key aspects of Deleuze’s cinematic philosophy, especially the ethical and political implications we find in the conclusion of Cinema 2.

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Cinematic Brain: Between Deleuze and Bellour · Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS