WELDING QUALITY CONTROL USING THE FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) METHOD AT PT. X

This research aims to identify and analyze defects in the welding process at PT. X uses the FMEA method. The primary defects found were cracks, porosity, spatter, and undercut. The leading causes of crack defects are poor material conditions, porosity caused by inadequate facilities, spatter due to inappropriate parameter settings, and undercut due to lack of supervision. The highest RPN value is crack, with a score of 288, followed by porosity (280), spatter (196), and undercut (175), indicating that crack and porosity require special attention. Improvement strategies include improving material quality and inspection procedures for cracks, improving facilities for porosity, operator training and automated monitoring for spatter, and increased monitoring for undercuts. Based on the visualization of the Pareto diagram, the number of defects that frequently occurred was spatter in 16 cases with a percentage of 36%, followed by undercut in 11 cases (25%), crack in 9 cases (21%), and porosity in 8 cases (18%). This data was collected from production that experienced defects from January – April 2024. The Pareto diagram shows that spatter is the most frequently occurring defect, even though it has a lower RPN than crack and porosity. Therefore, the repair priority must remain on crack and porosity because of their significant impact on weld quality. Implementing the proposed improvement strategy is expected to reduce the risk of failure and increase the efficiency and quality of the welding process at PT. X.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine-Earth Science and Technology
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12962/j27745449.v5i2.1807
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WELDING QUALITY CONTROL USING THE FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) METHOD AT PT. X

1 citations
Journal of Marine-Earth Science and Technology
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
0.35
article

WELDING QUALITY CONTROL USING THE FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) METHOD AT PT. X

article en
1 citations

Abstract

This research aims to identify and analyze defects in the welding process at PT. X uses the FMEA method. The primary defects found were cracks, porosity, spatter, and undercut. The leading causes of crack defects are poor material conditions, porosity caused by inadequate facilities, spatter due to inappropriate parameter settings, and undercut due to lack of supervision. The highest RPN value is crack, with a score of 288, followed by porosity (280), spatter (196), and undercut (175), indicating that crack and porosity require special attention. Improvement strategies include improving material quality and inspection procedures for cracks, improving facilities for porosity, operator training and automated monitoring for spatter, and increased monitoring for undercuts. Based on the visualization of the Pareto diagram, the number of defects that frequently occurred was spatter in 16 cases with a percentage of 36%, followed by undercut in 11 cases (25%), crack in 9 cases (21%), and porosity in 8 cases (18%). This data was collected from production that experienced defects from January – April 2024. The Pareto diagram shows that spatter is the most frequently occurring defect, even though it has a lower RPN than crack and porosity. Therefore, the repair priority must remain on crack and porosity because of their significant impact on weld quality. Implementing the proposed improvement strategy is expected to reduce the risk of failure and increase the efficiency and quality of the welding process at PT. X.

Journal of Marine-Earth Science and TechnologyVol. 5(2)
Diponegoro University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.