Oral Adverse Event Reporting in Smoking Cessation Trials Using Non-Combustible Nicotine Products: A Quality Assessment.

Objectives To assess the completeness and quality of reporting of oral adverse events (OAEs) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated non-combustible nicotine products (NCNPs) and whether reporting practices have improved over time.Data Sources And Study Selection This secondary data analysis was based on 36 RCTs included in a previous systematic review. Trials involved adult smokers and included nicotine replacement therapy, electronic cigarettes, heated tobacco, and smokeless tobacco. The OAE reporting was evaluated using an adapted CONSORT Harms checklist. An Adjusted Checklist Score (ACS), representing the proportion of criteria met, was calculated. Univariate linear regressions explored the association between ACS and study-level variables (publication year, country, funding, blinding and product type).Results OAE reporting was fragmented, with a mean ACS of 0.52 (0.11-0.74). Over 80% of studies (n=30) provided some quantitative data, but only 53% (n=19) presented results in a tabulated, arm-specific format. Definitions of OAEs and severity measurement were rarely reported (n=5, 14% and n=6, 17% respectively). The method of OAEs collection was described in 50% of the studies (n=18). OAEs were rarely mentioned in titles (n=4, 11%) and conclusions (n=13, 36%). Only 28% (n=10) and 44% (n=16) of the studies reported the analysis approach and statistical methods for AEs, respectively. A weak, non-significant positive correlation was found between ACS and year of publication (r = 0.288, p = 0.09). No study-level variable showed a statistically significant association with ACS.Conclusions Reporting of OAEs in clinical trials of NCNPs remains limited and inconsistent, often lacking clear definitions, standardized severity assessments, detailed data collection methods, and predefined statistical plans.Clinical Significance Standardized OAE reporting is critical for tolerability data interpretation. We proposed practical recommendations to guide researchers in improving the reporting of OAE and strengthening the role of dental professionals in supporting patients through smoking cessation strategies.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/91027
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oral Adverse Event Reporting in Smoking Cessation Trials Using Non-Combustible Nicotine Products: A Quality Assessment.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Oral Adverse Event Reporting in Smoking Cessation Trials Using Non-Combustible Nicotine Products: A Quality Assessment.

article en

Abstract

Objectives To assess the completeness and quality of reporting of oral adverse events (OAEs) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated non-combustible nicotine products (NCNPs) and whether reporting practices have improved over time.Data Sources And Study Selection This secondary data analysis was based on 36 RCTs included in a previous systematic review. Trials involved adult smokers and included nicotine replacement therapy, electronic cigarettes, heated tobacco, and smokeless tobacco. The OAE reporting was evaluated using an adapted CONSORT Harms checklist. An Adjusted Checklist Score (ACS), representing the proportion of criteria met, was calculated. Univariate linear regressions explored the association between ACS and study-level variables (publication year, country, funding, blinding and product type).Results OAE reporting was fragmented, with a mean ACS of 0.52 (0.11-0.74). Over 80% of studies (n=30) provided some quantitative data, but only 53% (n=19) presented results in a tabulated, arm-specific format. Definitions of OAEs and severity measurement were rarely reported (n=5, 14% and n=6, 17% respectively). The method of OAEs collection was described in 50% of the studies (n=18). OAEs were rarely mentioned in titles (n=4, 11%) and conclusions (n=13, 36%). Only 28% (n=10) and 44% (n=16) of the studies reported the analysis approach and statistical methods for AEs, respectively. A weak, non-significant positive correlation was found between ACS and year of publication (r = 0.288, p = 0.09). No study-level variable showed a statistically significant association with ACS.Conclusions Reporting of OAEs in clinical trials of NCNPs remains limited and inconsistent, often lacking clear definitions, standardized severity assessments, detailed data collection methods, and predefined statistical plans.Clinical Significance Standardized OAE reporting is critical for tolerability data interpretation. We proposed practical recommendations to guide researchers in improving the reporting of OAE and strengthening the role of dental professionals in supporting patients through smoking cessation strategies.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Primary Health Care (QA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.