DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF PLEURAL FLUID GLUCOSE IN DIFFERENTIATING MALIGNANT AND BENIGN PLEURAL EFFUSIONS

Background: Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) are a common and serious complication of cancer, significantly affecting patient quality of life and survival. Biochemical analysis of pleural fluid, including glucose measurement, plays a vital role in evaluating the nature of pleural effusions. Objective: To assess the diagnostic utility of pleural fluid glucose in distinguishing malignant from benign pleural effusions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted, evaluating pleural glucose levels in patients with malignant and benign pleural effusions. Statistical methods included the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to assess distribution, followed by Independent Samples t-tests and the Mann-Whitney U test to compare glucose levels between the two groups. Results: Glucose values exhibited a non-normal distribution (Kolmogorov-Smirnov, p < 0.001). Comparative analysis using both parametric and non-parametric tests showed no statistically significant difference between malignant and benign groups (Levene’s test p = 0.763, t-test p = 0.874, Mann-Whitney U p = 0.871). These findings suggest that glucose concentration alone does not have discriminatory power for MPE diagnosis. Conclusion: Although pleural fluid glucose is commonly reduced in malignant effusions, particularly when tumor invasion is advanced, this study found no significant difference in glucose levels between malignant and benign cases. Glucose should not be used in isolation as a diagnostic marker for MPE and must be interpreted alongside other clinical and biochemical indicators.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17012678
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF PLEURAL FLUID GLUCOSE IN DIFFERENTIATING MALIGNANT AND BENIGN PLEURAL EFFUSIONS

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF PLEURAL FLUID GLUCOSE IN DIFFERENTIATING MALIGNANT AND BENIGN PLEURAL EFFUSIONS

article en

Abstract

Background: Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) are a common and serious complication of cancer, significantly affecting patient quality of life and survival. Biochemical analysis of pleural fluid, including glucose measurement, plays a vital role in evaluating the nature of pleural effusions. Objective: To assess the diagnostic utility of pleural fluid glucose in distinguishing malignant from benign pleural effusions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted, evaluating pleural glucose levels in patients with malignant and benign pleural effusions. Statistical methods included the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to assess distribution, followed by Independent Samples t-tests and the Mann-Whitney U test to compare glucose levels between the two groups. Results: Glucose values exhibited a non-normal distribution (Kolmogorov-Smirnov, p < 0.001). Comparative analysis using both parametric and non-parametric tests showed no statistically significant difference between malignant and benign groups (Levene’s test p = 0.763, t-test p = 0.874, Mann-Whitney U p = 0.871). These findings suggest that glucose concentration alone does not have discriminatory power for MPE diagnosis. Conclusion: Although pleural fluid glucose is commonly reduced in malignant effusions, particularly when tumor invasion is advanced, this study found no significant difference in glucose levels between malignant and benign cases. Glucose should not be used in isolation as a diagnostic marker for MPE and must be interpreted alongside other clinical and biochemical indicators.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.