GRAND STRATEGY AS A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR U.S. FOREIGN POLICY ANALYSIS IN THE TRUMP ERA.

Grand strategy has long been the framing blueprint for U.S. foreign policy, enabling Washington to mobilize national power, maintain alliances, and guide the international order. Though commonly regarded as continuity from one government to the next, the Trump era placed both durability and contestation for American grand strategy in relief. Trump’s “America First” policy rebranded the engagement-restraint balance, transiting America’s policy from institutionalized liberal internationalism to transactional realism and selective retrenchment. This essay examines grand strategy as a theoretical framework to understand the U.S. foreign policy under Trump’s administration, drawing reference to competing schools of “deep engagement” and “offshore balancing.” It argues that Trump’s regime was not doctrinal chaos or complete rupture but rather a rebalanced reaction to the extended strategic controversies.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17007682
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GRAND STRATEGY AS A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR U.S. FOREIGN POLICY ANALYSIS IN THE TRUMP ERA.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

GRAND STRATEGY AS A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR U.S. FOREIGN POLICY ANALYSIS IN THE TRUMP ERA.

article en

Abstract

Grand strategy has long been the framing blueprint for U.S. foreign policy, enabling Washington to mobilize national power, maintain alliances, and guide the international order. Though commonly regarded as continuity from one government to the next, the Trump era placed both durability and contestation for American grand strategy in relief. Trump’s “America First” policy rebranded the engagement-restraint balance, transiting America’s policy from institutionalized liberal internationalism to transactional realism and selective retrenchment. This essay examines grand strategy as a theoretical framework to understand the U.S. foreign policy under Trump’s administration, drawing reference to competing schools of “deep engagement” and “offshore balancing.” It argues that Trump’s regime was not doctrinal chaos or complete rupture but rather a rebalanced reaction to the extended strategic controversies.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.