Regulatory Cooperation under the Climate Club

This article argues that regulatory cooperation is emerging as a new frontier in climate governance, becoming a useful tool for aligning approaches to the implementation of carbon-related measures. It examines the newly established Climate Club as a novel form of minilateral cooperative arrangement, focusing on its potential to serve as a central platform for regulatory cooperation on sectoral emissions accounting methodologies and monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) systems used in implementing trade-related carbon restrictions. However, unlike a typical club from Buchanan’s club theory, the Climate Club extends an invitation to all countries committed to ambitious climate action, encouraging them to help shape its evolving concept and structure. How this will function in practice remains unclear, as preventing free-riding in the provision of public goods (such as a safe climate) typically requires a degree of exclusivity. In this context, the article addresses the following questions: Can an open climate club with low entry barriers and minimal member commitments still be effective for regulatory cooperation? How might such cooperation within the Climate Club evolve, and what challenges could it face? What could countries such as South Korea gain from participating in the club, and how might they contribute to its success?

Publication Details

Journal
Korea Europe Review
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48770/ker.2025.no8.60
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulatory Cooperation under the Climate Club

Korea Europe Review
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Regulatory Cooperation under the Climate Club

article en

Abstract

This article argues that regulatory cooperation is emerging as a new frontier in climate governance, becoming a useful tool for aligning approaches to the implementation of carbon-related measures. It examines the newly established Climate Club as a novel form of minilateral cooperative arrangement, focusing on its potential to serve as a central platform for regulatory cooperation on sectoral emissions accounting methodologies and monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) systems used in implementing trade-related carbon restrictions. However, unlike a typical club from Buchanan’s club theory, the Climate Club extends an invitation to all countries committed to ambitious climate action, encouraging them to help shape its evolving concept and structure. How this will function in practice remains unclear, as preventing free-riding in the provision of public goods (such as a safe climate) typically requires a degree of exclusivity. In this context, the article addresses the following questions: Can an open climate club with low entry barriers and minimal member commitments still be effective for regulatory cooperation? How might such cooperation within the Climate Club evolve, and what challenges could it face? What could countries such as South Korea gain from participating in the club, and how might they contribute to its success?

Korea Europe Review
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.