Neurodiversity, corporate boards and corporate performance: a systematic review, evidence-based recommendations and future research agenda

Purpose Globally, an increasing number of people are not only being medically diagnosed and classified as neurodiverse but also facilitated to participate in economic and social activities, including appointment to corporate boards. The study offers a comprehensive and up-to-date systematic literature review (SLR) of the existing studies on neurodivergent individuals (NDIs), neurodivergent individuals on corporate boards (NDOCBs) and their impact on corporate performance. We seek to synthesise and expand the present understanding of both the existing (1) theoretical foundations and (2) empirical literature on (a) multi-level antecedents of NDIs and NDOCBs and (b) the impacts that NDOCBs have on corporate performance. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a three-step SLR method and bibliometric analysis to review one of the most extensive SLR datasets available to date on NDIs and NDOCBs, involving 159 theoretical, quantitative, qualitative and mixed studies undertaken in more than 70 countries from 1976 to 2022. Findings Based on publications in 118 scholarly journals, we discover that most of the available research is descriptive and/or relies on one theory or none, rather than multi-theoretical views. Second, we find that firm-level antecedents of NDIs and NDOCBs, rather than country-level antecedents, have been the focus of previous research. Third, there are noticeable methodological limitations, such as the scarcity of cross-country, mixed-methods and qualitative studies. Originality/value There is little understanding of how neurodiverse people contribute to corporate performance decisions. Synthesis of literature reveals that existing studies examining NDIs and NDOCBs and corporate performance, particularly from an accounting perspective, are rare. Subsequently, we offer an extensive and timely SLR of the existing studies on NDOCBs and corporate performance, highlighting the limitations and discussing the prospects for future research on NDIs and NDOCBs.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting Literature
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jal-02-2025-0089
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neurodiversity, corporate boards and corporate performance: a systematic review, evidence-based recommendations and future research agenda

Journal of Accounting Literature
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Neurodiversity, corporate boards and corporate performance: a systematic review, evidence-based recommendations and future research agenda

article en

Abstract

Purpose Globally, an increasing number of people are not only being medically diagnosed and classified as neurodiverse but also facilitated to participate in economic and social activities, including appointment to corporate boards. The study offers a comprehensive and up-to-date systematic literature review (SLR) of the existing studies on neurodivergent individuals (NDIs), neurodivergent individuals on corporate boards (NDOCBs) and their impact on corporate performance. We seek to synthesise and expand the present understanding of both the existing (1) theoretical foundations and (2) empirical literature on (a) multi-level antecedents of NDIs and NDOCBs and (b) the impacts that NDOCBs have on corporate performance. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a three-step SLR method and bibliometric analysis to review one of the most extensive SLR datasets available to date on NDIs and NDOCBs, involving 159 theoretical, quantitative, qualitative and mixed studies undertaken in more than 70 countries from 1976 to 2022. Findings Based on publications in 118 scholarly journals, we discover that most of the available research is descriptive and/or relies on one theory or none, rather than multi-theoretical views. Second, we find that firm-level antecedents of NDIs and NDOCBs, rather than country-level antecedents, have been the focus of previous research. Third, there are noticeable methodological limitations, such as the scarcity of cross-country, mixed-methods and qualitative studies. Originality/value There is little understanding of how neurodiverse people contribute to corporate performance decisions. Synthesis of literature reveals that existing studies examining NDIs and NDOCBs and corporate performance, particularly from an accounting perspective, are rare. Subsequently, we offer an extensive and timely SLR of the existing studies on NDOCBs and corporate performance, highlighting the limitations and discussing the prospects for future research on NDIs and NDOCBs.

Journal of Accounting Literature
University of Nottingham (GB), Swansea University (GB), Azerbaijan State University of Economics (AZ), College of Accounting (SI), University of Southampton (GB), KIMEP University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.