Gonolabis woodwardi Burr 1908

3. Gonolabis woodwardi Burr, 1908 Original combination Gonolabis woodwardi Burr, 1908: 76–79. Current combination Mongolabis woodwardi (Burr, 1908) — Steinmann, 1989: 296–297. Type material Syntypes (6 males, 16 females; in ethanol) AUSTRALIA • 1 ♀ (Fig. 3); “Hambg. S.W. Austral. Exp. 1905 / 117 Fremantle / Kalkhügel 23.VII // ♀ / Gonolabis woodwardi Burr // ZMH 76685 “ • 1 ♀ (Fig. 4); “Hambg. S.W. Austral. Exp. 1905 / 94 Coolgardie / 3.VII. // Gonolabis woodwardi Burr // ZMH 76686 ” • 1 ♀ (Fig. 5); “Hambg. S.W. Austral. Exp. 1905 / 152 Gooseberry Hill / 31.V. // ♀ / Gonolabis woodwardi Burr // ZMH 76687 ” • 3 ♀ (Fig. 6–8); “ Gonolabis woodwardi Burr ♀ // Hambg. S.W. Austral. Exp. 1905 / 95 Boorabbin / 3.VII. // ZMH 866000 –866002” • 2 ♀ (Fig. 9–10); “ Gonolabis woodwardi Burr // Hambg. S.W. Austral. Exp. 1905 / 136 Harvey / 27.VII. // ZMH 866003 –866004” • 1 ♂ (Fig. 11); “ Gonolabis woodwardi Burr // Hambg. S.W. Austral. Exp. 1905 / 136 Harvey / 27.VII. // ZMH 866005 ” • 2 ♀ (Fig. 12–13); “ Gonolabis woodwardi Burr // Hambg. S.W. Austral. Exp. 1905 / 136 Harvey / 27.VII. // ZMH 866006 – 866007” • 1 ♂ (Fig. 14); “Gonilabis woodwardi Burr // Hambg. S.W. Austral. Exp. 1905 / 99 Lion Mill / 22.V. // ZMH 866008 ” • 2 ♀ (Fig. 15–16); “Gonilabis woodwardi Burr // Hambg. S.W. Austral. Exp. 1905 / 99 Lion Mill / 22.V. // ZMH 866009 –866010” • 1 ♂ (Fig. 17); “Gonilabis woodwardi Burr // Hambg. S.W. Austral. Exp. 1905 / 99 Lion Mill / 22.V. // ZMH 866011 ” • 1 ♀ (Fig. 18); “Gonilabis woodwardi Burr // Hambg. S.W. Austral. Exp. 1905 / 99 Lion Mill / 22.V. // ZMH 866012 ” • 2 ♂ (Fig. 19–20); “Hambg. S.W. Austral. Exp. 1905 / 98 Wooroloo / 29.V. // Gonolabis / woodwardi Burr // ZMH 866024 –866025” • 3 ♀ (Fig. 21–23); “Hambg. S.W. Austral. Exp. 1905 / 98 Wooroloo / 29.V. // Gonolabis / woodwardi Burr // ZMH 866026 –866028” • 1 ♂ (Fig. 24); “Hambg. S.W. Austral. Exp. 1905 / 98 Wooroloo / 29.V. // Gonolabis / woodwardi Burr // ZMH 866029 ” Type locality [Western Australia]. Current status Valid species. Remarks There are some inconsistencies between the specimen labels and the information written in the original publication regarding collecting dates. This might be due to a mistake done by the author. Comparing the collection information from our type specimens with those from other specimens collected during the expedition, we assume that the specimen labels show the correct data.