Spongophora lutea de Bormans 1894

15. Spongophora lutea de Bormans, 1894 Original combination Spongophora lutea de Bormans, 1894: 383–385. Current combination Paralabella lutea (de Bormans, 1894) — Steinmann, 1989: 583–584. Type material Syntype (1 female; dried, on cardboard) MYANMAR • 1 ♀ (Fig. 52); “Sphongophora / lutea Borm. / sp. n. // Kotype // Paratypoid // Carin Ghecù / 1300–1400 m / L. Fea V.88 // Birma / Leon. Fea leg. / vend. 1.1.1895. // A. de Bormans / determ. // ZMH 76581 ” Type locality Carin Ghecú, Carin Chebà & Carin Asciuii Chebà [Myanmar]. Current status Valid species. Remarks The original species name should actually be Spongiphora lutea, as de Bormans (1894) seems to have misspelled the genus. Furthermore, it seems like a wrong collection date (May instead of March) is written on the specimen label. As this particular information was added in writing on the otherwise printed label it might be a mistake.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16982298
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spongophora lutea de Bormans 1894

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Spongophora lutea de Bormans 1894

article en

Abstract

15. Spongophora lutea de Bormans, 1894 Original combination Spongophora lutea de Bormans, 1894: 383–385. Current combination Paralabella lutea (de Bormans, 1894) — Steinmann, 1989: 583–584. Type material Syntype (1 female; dried, on cardboard) MYANMAR • 1 ♀ (Fig. 52); “Sphongophora / lutea Borm. / sp. n. // Kotype // Paratypoid // Carin Ghecù / 1300–1400 m / L. Fea V.88 // Birma / Leon. Fea leg. / vend. 1.1.1895. // A. de Bormans / determ. // ZMH 76581 ” Type locality Carin Ghecú, Carin Chebà & Carin Asciuii Chebà [Myanmar]. Current status Valid species. Remarks The original species name should actually be Spongiphora lutea, as de Bormans (1894) seems to have misspelled the genus. Furthermore, it seems like a wrong collection date (May instead of March) is written on the specimen label. As this particular information was added in writing on the otherwise printed label it might be a mistake.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Museum für Naturkunde (DE), State Museum of Natural History Karlsruhe (DE), Museum am Rothenbaum (DE), Senckenberg German Entomological Institute (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Spongophora lutea de Bormans 1894 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS