3.6 Cross-Compliance in integrative planning

This Deliverable D3.6 presents the results of CrossGov’s Task 3.2, which investigates the coherence among planning systems established under three EU Directives: the Water Framework Directive (WFD), the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), and the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive (MSPD). The analysis is based on four case studies located in the Finnish Archipelago, the North Adriatic Sea, the French Mediterranean Sea, and the Oslo Fjord. The study Page 2 of 111 explores whether planning processes under these directives operate in cross-compliance to support the European Green Deal (EGD) objectives on zero pollution and marine biodiversity. Two analytical frameworks guided the research: the Policy Coherence Framework and the Science-PolicySociety Interface assessment framework. Findings highlight mechanisms and practices used by national and local authorities to enhance policy coherence, particularly horizontal coherence across the three planning systems. The case studies also identify areas of incoherence and suggestions or transferable lessons, especially where operational solutions already exist area also offered. These insights may be relevant to other EU contexts aiming to strengthen integrated marine and water governance in support of EGD goals

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16980791
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3.6 Cross-Compliance in integrative planning

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

3.6 Cross-Compliance in integrative planning

article en

Abstract

This Deliverable D3.6 presents the results of CrossGov’s Task 3.2, which investigates the coherence among planning systems established under three EU Directives: the Water Framework Directive (WFD), the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), and the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive (MSPD). The analysis is based on four case studies located in the Finnish Archipelago, the North Adriatic Sea, the French Mediterranean Sea, and the Oslo Fjord. The study Page 2 of 111 explores whether planning processes under these directives operate in cross-compliance to support the European Green Deal (EGD) objectives on zero pollution and marine biodiversity. Two analytical frameworks guided the research: the Policy Coherence Framework and the Science-PolicySociety Interface assessment framework. Findings highlight mechanisms and practices used by national and local authorities to enhance policy coherence, particularly horizontal coherence across the three planning systems. The case studies also identify areas of incoherence and suggestions or transferable lessons, especially where operational solutions already exist area also offered. These insights may be relevant to other EU contexts aiming to strengthen integrated marine and water governance in support of EGD goals

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Eastern Finland (FI), Finnish Environment Institute (FI), Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NO), Finland University (FI), Varian Medical Systems (Switzerland) (CH)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.