Biais comportementaux et décisions financières : une revue systématique et une analyse bibliométrique de la transition de la théorie classique vers la finance comportementale

This paper examines the conceptual evolution of financial decision-making models, highlighting the transition from traditional economic theories to the behavioural perspective. Foundational frameworks such as the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) and Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) are built on assumptions of perfect rationality and information symmetry in markets. However, these models fall short in accounting for the erratic and often illogical decisions observed among investors.As a response to these theoretical shortcomings, behavioural finance has gained prominence by integrating psychological dimensions into the analysis of financial actions. This work conducts a systematic review of recent academic contributions focused on behavioural biases that influence individual financial behaviour, asset pricing mechanisms, and investment outcomes.The study identifies a notable academic shift—from macro-level theories of market functioning to a growing focus on micro-level investor cognition. This shift is also reflected in the increasing volume of research investigating how mental shortcuts and emotional reactions shape financial choices.The findings suggest that incorporating behavioural insights is essential for designing more effective investment strategies and risk assessment tools. Furthermore, this approach offers a promising path toward understanding persistent market anomalies and contributes to the development of a more realistic theory of investor behaviour.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16964004
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biais comportementaux et décisions financières : une revue systématique et une analyse bibliométrique de la transition de la théorie classique vers la finance comportementale

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Biais comportementaux et décisions financières : une revue systématique et une analyse bibliométrique de la transition de la théorie classique vers la finance comportementale

article en

Abstract

This paper examines the conceptual evolution of financial decision-making models, highlighting the transition from traditional economic theories to the behavioural perspective. Foundational frameworks such as the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) and Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) are built on assumptions of perfect rationality and information symmetry in markets. However, these models fall short in accounting for the erratic and often illogical decisions observed among investors.As a response to these theoretical shortcomings, behavioural finance has gained prominence by integrating psychological dimensions into the analysis of financial actions. This work conducts a systematic review of recent academic contributions focused on behavioural biases that influence individual financial behaviour, asset pricing mechanisms, and investment outcomes.The study identifies a notable academic shift—from macro-level theories of market functioning to a growing focus on micro-level investor cognition. This shift is also reflected in the increasing volume of research investigating how mental shortcuts and emotional reactions shape financial choices.The findings suggest that incorporating behavioural insights is essential for designing more effective investment strategies and risk assessment tools. Furthermore, this approach offers a promising path toward understanding persistent market anomalies and contributes to the development of a more realistic theory of investor behaviour.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Hassan II Casablanca (MA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.