Measuring disability in censuses: the case of South Africa

This paper reports on findings from the South African census content research to develop a disability set of questions for Census 2011. The findings of this research are used to determine, firstly, whether the Washington Group on Disability Statistics (WG) Short Set (revised for the South African context) is an appropriate set of questions to measure disability in Censuses, and, secondly, whether it is sufficient to ask about basic domains in order to identify the population at risk of experiencing disability related disadvantage and discrimination. The methodology is a national survey using a population based representative sample. The focus of the research were two sets of questions: the first being the Short Set for Census proposed by the WG, and the second being the disability questions used in the 2001 South African Census. The survey comprised three questionnaires: a Household Questionnaire with one member of the household responding for the whole household; a Living Standard Measure (LSM) questionnaire administered to the same person about the whole household; and an adult questionnaire administered to all household members 15 years and older who could respond for themselves. The findings support the use of the revised WG Short Set as an appropriate Census measures. It captures a broader and more inclusive population as having difficulties compared to that captured on the Census 2001 disability question, without excluding the Census 2001 population captured as disabled. The results are inconclusive with regard to the sufficiency of basic domains as a measure of the population at risk. Further testing is required to understand how people understand and respond to questions such as 'do you have difficulties in taking care of your household responsibilities or in your day to day work/schoolwork?'.

Publication Details

Journal
Human Science Research Council SA
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14749/29996464
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring disability in censuses: the case of South Africa

Human Science Research Council SA
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Measuring disability in censuses: the case of South Africa

article en

Abstract

This paper reports on findings from the South African census content research to develop a disability set of questions for Census 2011. The findings of this research are used to determine, firstly, whether the Washington Group on Disability Statistics (WG) Short Set (revised for the South African context) is an appropriate set of questions to measure disability in Censuses, and, secondly, whether it is sufficient to ask about basic domains in order to identify the population at risk of experiencing disability related disadvantage and discrimination. The methodology is a national survey using a population based representative sample. The focus of the research were two sets of questions: the first being the Short Set for Census proposed by the WG, and the second being the disability questions used in the 2001 South African Census. The survey comprised three questionnaires: a Household Questionnaire with one member of the household responding for the whole household; a Living Standard Measure (LSM) questionnaire administered to the same person about the whole household; and an adult questionnaire administered to all household members 15 years and older who could respond for themselves. The findings support the use of the revised WG Short Set as an appropriate Census measures. It captures a broader and more inclusive population as having difficulties compared to that captured on the Census 2001 disability question, without excluding the Census 2001 population captured as disabled. The results are inconclusive with regard to the sufficiency of basic domains as a measure of the population at risk. Further testing is required to understand how people understand and respond to questions such as 'do you have difficulties in taking care of your household responsibilities or in your day to day work/schoolwork?'.

Human Science Research Council SA
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.