Apples and pineapples: Why do corruption and trust levels differ between Denmark and Mexico? A comparative analysis of two extreme OECD countries

This article compares Denmark and Mexico as two extremes within the OECD in terms of corruption and social trust. While Denmark is often seen as the epitome of a high-trust, low-corruption society, Mexico struggles with persistent corruption and low trust in public institutions. Using the metaphor of “Getting to Denmark,” the study explores how state capacity, impartial rule of law, and trustworthy institutions contribute to sustaining trust and reducing corruption. Drawing on survey data, theoretical insights, and policy perspectives, the paper highlights the crucial role of impartial and non-corrupt courts as a cornerstone of social trust. The analysis demonstrates how corruption and trust reinforce one another in self-perpetuating cycles—virtuous in Denmark and vicious in Mexico. Finally, the article discusses lessons for policy reforms and the challenges of institutional transformation in contexts marked by entrenched corruption and weak social trust.<br/>