Is the Frequency Principle always valid?

We investigate the learning dynamics of shallow ReLU neural networks on the unit sphere \(S^2\subset\mathbb{R}^3\) in polar coordinates \((τ,ϕ)\), considering both fixed and trainable neuron directions \(\{w_i\}\). For fixed weights, spherical harmonic expansions reveal an intrinsic low-frequency preference with coefficients decaying as \(O(\ell^{5/2}/2^\ell)\), typically leading to the Frequency Principle (FP) of lower-frequency-first learning. However, this principle can be violated under specific initial conditions or error distributions. With trainable weights, an additional rotation term in the harmonic evolution equations preserves exponential decay with decay order \(O(\ell^{7/2}/2^\ell)\) factor, also leading to the FP of lower-frequency-first learning. But like fixed weights case, the principle can be violated under specific initial conditions or error distributions. Our numerical results demonstrate that trainable directions increase learning complexity and can either maintain a low-frequency advantage or enable faster high-frequency emergence. This analysis suggests the FP should be viewed as a tendency rather than a rule on curved domains like \(S^2\), providing insights into how direction updates and harmonic expansions shape frequency-dependent learning.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-08-24
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is the Frequency Principle always valid?

ArXiv.org
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Is the Frequency Principle always valid?

article en

Abstract

We investigate the learning dynamics of shallow ReLU neural networks on the unit sphere \(S^2\subset\mathbb{R}^3\) in polar coordinates \((τ,ϕ)\), considering both fixed and trainable neuron directions \(\{w_i\}\). For fixed weights, spherical harmonic expansions reveal an intrinsic low-frequency preference with coefficients decaying as \(O(\ell^{5/2}/2^\ell)\), typically leading to the Frequency Principle (FP) of lower-frequency-first learning. However, this principle can be violated under specific initial conditions or error distributions. With trainable weights, an additional rotation term in the harmonic evolution equations preserves exponential decay with decay order \(O(\ell^{7/2}/2^\ell)\) factor, also leading to the FP of lower-frequency-first learning. But like fixed weights case, the principle can be violated under specific initial conditions or error distributions. Our numerical results demonstrate that trainable directions increase learning complexity and can either maintain a low-frequency advantage or enable faster high-frequency emergence. This analysis suggests the FP should be viewed as a tendency rather than a rule on curved domains like \(S^2\), providing insights into how direction updates and harmonic expansions shape frequency-dependent learning.

ArXiv.org
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is the Frequency Principle always valid? · ArXiv.org (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS