On the complexity of parametrized motion planning algorithms

We study a probabilistic variant of the r-th sequential parametrized topological complexity, which bounds this classical invariant from below and measures the difficulty in constructing permissive parametrized motion planning algorithms. On one hand, we use cohomology to show that this new invariant behaves similarly to the classical invariant on Fadell-Neuwirth fibrations and oriented sphere bundles; on the other hand, we use equivariant homotopy theory to prove that its behavior is wildly different on bundles whose fibers are real projective spaces and whose structure groups are special orthogonal groups. We also explore several other features of our invariant and its relationships with various other invariants motivated by topological robotics.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-08-25
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the complexity of parametrized motion planning algorithms

ArXiv.org
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

On the complexity of parametrized motion planning algorithms

article en

Abstract

We study a probabilistic variant of the r-th sequential parametrized topological complexity, which bounds this classical invariant from below and measures the difficulty in constructing permissive parametrized motion planning algorithms. On one hand, we use cohomology to show that this new invariant behaves similarly to the classical invariant on Fadell-Neuwirth fibrations and oriented sphere bundles; on the other hand, we use equivariant homotopy theory to prove that its behavior is wildly different on bundles whose fibers are real projective spaces and whose structure groups are special orthogonal groups. We also explore several other features of our invariant and its relationships with various other invariants motivated by topological robotics.

ArXiv.org
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the complexity of parametrized motion planning algorithms · ArXiv.org (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS