Do AI Agents Need Mentors? Evaluating Chain-Pattern Interrupt (CPI) for Oversight and Reliability

<p>AI agents tackling complex, long-horizon tasks can get trapped in reasoning lock-in (RLI), where small misconceptions early in the task cascade into errors, wasted tokens and destructive outcomes. We introduce Chain-Pattern Interrupt (CPI), an external mentor mechanism that 'pauses' the agent at uncertainty or hazard points and elicits a mentor-like re-evaluation before continuing. We evaluate on two adversarial benchmarks: a debugging scenario and a priority-conflict scenario. With CPI, agents consistently deliver the requested outputs, avoid misleading suggestions, and roughly double success while reducing harmful actions by half. Our evaluation harness, logs, audit trails and replication instructions are released, enabling full reproducibility. Across 153 runs, success increased from 27% to 54% and harmful actions fell substantially; pooled OR 1.98 (CMH = 0.099). We show confidence intervals and full tests in Appendix B.</p>

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.18237.93922
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do AI Agents Need Mentors? Evaluating Chain-Pattern Interrupt (CPI) for Oversight and Reliability

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Do AI Agents Need Mentors? Evaluating Chain-Pattern Interrupt (CPI) for Oversight and Reliability

article en

Abstract

<p>AI agents tackling complex, long-horizon tasks can get trapped in reasoning lock-in (RLI), where small misconceptions early in the task cascade into errors, wasted tokens and destructive outcomes. We introduce Chain-Pattern Interrupt (CPI), an external mentor mechanism that 'pauses' the agent at uncertainty or hazard points and elicits a mentor-like re-evaluation before continuing. We evaluate on two adversarial benchmarks: a debugging scenario and a priority-conflict scenario. With CPI, agents consistently deliver the requested outputs, avoid misleading suggestions, and roughly double success while reducing harmful actions by half. Our evaluation harness, logs, audit trails and replication instructions are released, enabling full reproducibility. Across 153 runs, success increased from 27% to 54% and harmful actions fell substantially; pooled OR 1.98 (CMH = 0.099). We show confidence intervals and full tests in Appendix B.</p>

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.