Value Directed Encoding - Win and Loss Framework

People tend to encode high-value information better than low-value information. This value-directed encoding effect (VDE) is usually studied in the context of future gains, whereas the impact of potential future losses has rarely been examined, particularly in recognition memory. This is a notable gap because behavioral economics suggests that subjects are highly motivated to avoid losses and that losses may capture more attention. Here, we compared the encoding of potential gains, losses, and neutral items in three recognition experiments. We also manipulated time constraints such that subjects had 1 second (Experiment 1), unlimited encoding time (Experiment 2), or 3 seconds (Experiment 3) to encode the valued words.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Science Framework
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/fzdyp
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Value Directed Encoding - Win and Loss Framework

Open Science Framework
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Value Directed Encoding - Win and Loss Framework

article en

Abstract

People tend to encode high-value information better than low-value information. This value-directed encoding effect (VDE) is usually studied in the context of future gains, whereas the impact of potential future losses has rarely been examined, particularly in recognition memory. This is a notable gap because behavioral economics suggests that subjects are highly motivated to avoid losses and that losses may capture more attention. Here, we compared the encoding of potential gains, losses, and neutral items in three recognition experiments. We also manipulated time constraints such that subjects had 1 second (Experiment 1), unlimited encoding time (Experiment 2), or 3 seconds (Experiment 3) to encode the valued words.

Open Science Framework
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.